Processed: tagging 942055

2020-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 942055 + confirmed Bug #942055 [ghostscript] cups-filters: Fails to print on Brother HL-2035 (foomatic/kl1250) with ghostscript 9.27~dfsg-2+deb10u2 armel Added tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Bug#950690: marked as done (cups-filters: Printing fails with an error about Grayscale/monochrome conversion)

2020-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 5 Feb 2020 23:06:49 + with message-id <05022020230145.b8d518645...@desktop.copernicus.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#950690: cups-filters: Printing fails with an error about Grayscale/monochrome conversion has caused the Debian Bug report #950690, regarding cups-filte

Re: Bug#950690: cups-filters: Printing fails with an error about Grayscale/monochrome conversion

2020-02-05 Thread Till Kamppeter
On 05/02/2020 20:14, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: So, I'm even more confused. I've upgraded again cups-filters (to 1.27.0-2) in order to do a comparison check, and tried to print, and it did work (with the Brother PPD, unchanged). This looks strange, there is no change in the pdftops filter which c

Bug#950690: cups-filters: Printing fails with an error about Grayscale/monochrome conversion

2020-02-05 Thread Till Kamppeter
I have tried it also and with the command line cupsfilter -p ../HL5250DN.ppd -i text/plain -m application/vnd.cups-postscript -e ~/.bashrc > out.ps 2>log I got valid PostScript output with a PJL header. Note that I had to specify both input and output MIME types. Probably in the cases whent

Re: Bug#950690: cups-filters: Printing fails with an error about Grayscale/monochrome conversion

2020-02-05 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 19:32 +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote: > Probably the best is to try to print without using PostScript. When > creating a print queue and selecting your printer's make, model, and > driver manually, have a look at PCL 6/XL (pxlmon

Bug#950690: cups-filters: Printing fails with an error about Grayscale/monochrome conversion

2020-02-05 Thread Brian Potkin
On Wed 05 Feb 2020 at 20:05:27 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 17:19 +, Brian Potkin wrote: > > > Not really sure, but I don't think so. I mean, I'm using the PPD file > > > from cups Debian packages, not anything from Brother. > > > > As root, what do you get for > >

Bug#950690: cups-filters: Printing fails with an error about Grayscale/monochrome conversion

2020-02-05 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 17:19 +, Brian Potkin wrote: > > Not really sure, but I don't think so. I mean, I'm using the PPD file > > from cups Debian packages, not anything from Brother. > > As root, what do you get for > > grep "*NickName" /etc/cups/ppd/ *NickName: "Brother HL-5250DN BR-Script

Re: Bug#950690: cups-filters: Printing fails with an error about Grayscale/monochrome conversion

2020-02-05 Thread Till Kamppeter
The warning about not being able to convert color input into grayscale is principally no problem for you, as monochrome PostScript printers can receive color input without any problems, they convert the input by themselves. What this warning tells to me is that you upgraded from a cups-filters

Bug#950690: cups-filters: Printing fails with an error about Grayscale/monochrome conversion

2020-02-05 Thread Brian Potkin
On Wed 05 Feb 2020 at 17:19:31 +, Brian Potkin wrote: > Open a new issue referring to #169 and referencing the Debian report. Sorry; I should have suggested leaving doing this until we both have had the opportunity to test the filtering system. Regards, Brian.

Bug#950690: cups-filters: Printing fails with an error about Grayscale/monochrome conversion

2020-02-05 Thread Brian Potkin
On Wed 05 Feb 2020 at 17:18:28 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 03:29:22PM +, Brian Potkin wrote: > > Your issue seems connected with > > > > https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups-filters/issues/169 > > > > and its associated bugs. > > When looking at the warning me

Bug#950690: cups-filters: Printing fails with an error about Grayscale/monochrome conversion

2020-02-05 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 03:29:22PM +, Brian Potkin wrote: > Your issue seems connected with > > https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups-filters/issues/169 > > and its associated bugs. When looking at the warning message in the logs I stumbled on that bug, but didn't really find it really infor

Bug#950690: cups-filters: Printing fails with an error about Grayscale/monochrome conversion

2020-02-05 Thread Brian Potkin
tags 950690 upstream thanks On Tue 04 Feb 2020 at 21:42:03 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > Package: cups-filters > Version: 1.27.0-2 > Severity: important > > Hi, > > since “some” time (few weeks maybe, I guess the 1.27.0 upload), I can't > print on my Brother HL-5250DN network printer (whic

Processed: Re: Bug#950690: cups-filters: Printing fails with an error about Grayscale/monochrome conversion

2020-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 950690 upstream Bug #950690 [cups-filters] cups-filters: Printing fails with an error about Grayscale/monochrome conversion Added tag(s) upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 950690: http

Bug#950669: cups-browsed: segfault at 0 ip 00000000f79ffb5b sp 00000000fffd3828 error 4 in libc-2.29.so

2020-02-05 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dixi quod… > A core dump would probably have been helpful… hmm… I’ll start > it again with ulimit -c unlimited and see if I can’t get one, > iff it dumps one _and_ I figure out where. Today, cups-browsed simply isn’t running (according to “ps ax”), but I don’t have a segfault in dmesg or ANYTHING

Processed: Re: Bug#942055: ghostscript in buster partly broken on armel?

2020-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 ghostscript Bug #942055 [cups-filters] cups-filters: Fails to print on Brother HL-2035 (foomatic/kl1250) with ghostscript 9.27~dfsg-2+deb10u2 armel Bug reassigned from package 'cups-filters' to 'ghostscript'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of b

Bug#942055: ghostscript in buster partly broken on armel?

2020-02-05 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
[ sent again to please Debian MTAs rejecting 8bit headers ] control: tag -1 wontfix Quoting Bernhard Übelacker (2020-02-04 20:13:41) > Control: fixed -1 9.26a~dfsg-0+deb9u6 > Control: fixed -1 9.26a~dfsg-0+deb9u1 > Control: fixed -1 9.25~dfsg-0+deb9u1 > Control: found -1 9.27~dfsg-3.1 > Control:

Bug#942055: ghostscript in buster partly broken on armel?

2020-02-05 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
control: reassign -1 ghostscript Control: fixed -1 9.26a~dfsg-0+deb9u6 Control: fixed -1 9.26a~dfsg-0+deb9u1 Control: fixed -1 9.25~dfsg-0+deb9u1 Control: found -1 9.27~dfsg-3.1 Control: found -1 9.27~dfsg-3 control: found -1 9.27~dfsg-2+deb10u3 control: found -1 9.27~dfsg-2+deb10u1 Control: found

Bug#942055: ghostscript in buster partly broken on armel?

2020-02-05 Thread Bernhard Übelacker
Hello Jonas, thanks for taking time for this bug. Am 05.02.20 um 11:02 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: > Hi Alexander, > > Quoting Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (2020-02-05 08:45:05) >> Am 2020-02-04 22:09, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: >> >>> Most notable change between 9.22 and 9.24 - and also applied to >

Processed: Re: Bug#942055: ghostscript in buster partly broken on armel?

2020-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 942055 cups-filters Bug #942055 [ghostscript] cups-filters: Fails to print on Brother HL-2035 (foomatic/kl1250) with ghostscript 9.27~dfsg-2+deb10u2 armel Bug reassigned from package 'ghostscript' to 'cups-filters'. No longer marked as f

Bug#942055: ghostscript in buster partly broken on armel?

2020-02-05 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
reassign 942055 cups-filters thanks Hi Jonas! * Jonas Smedegaard [200205 11:02]: > > I'm open for suggestion on how to continue next, but have honestly. If > > I should fill a bug against an other package, please let me know which > > one, as I have no idea, how these parts are interacting w

Re: Printing packaging rework 2020

2020-02-05 Thread Till Kamppeter
+1 from me, too. Make it Debian-first. We at Ubuntu will sync the Debian package, as we do with most printing-related packages currently. Till On 05/02/2020 07:44, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: By all means, please do it, but please make it Debian-first. I'd be very happy to review and uploa