It might be different from what everyone else is dealing with, but having
just enabled Kerberos in the CUPS interface after getting tickets, I tried
modifying a printer in the web interface that was not yet configured to use
it. This appears to cause CUPS to get in a loop calling cupsdDoSelect()
fo
forwarded 972898 https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1901556
thanks
On Sun 25 Oct 2020 at 22:47:08 +0100, Ahzo wrote:
> Package: hplip
> Version: 3.20.9+dfsg0-4
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
[...]
> PS: I tried to report this upstream, but my Launchpad login attempts
> always fail, b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 972898 https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1901556
Bug #972898 [hplip] hplip: no network scanner detection with 3.20.9
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1901556'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Quoting Fabian Greffrath (2020-10-26 12:10:06)
> Am 2020-10-26 11:01, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> > Your signalling that you think I am an idiot does not help here.
>
> I absolutely do not think you are an idiot! Quite the contrary, I
> assume you to be a very intelligent person, thus I wonder wh
Am 2020-10-26 11:01, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Your signalling that you think I am an idiot does not help here.
I absolutely do not think you are an idiot! Quite the contrary, I assume
you to be a very intelligent person, thus I wonder why you ask me to
repeat my arguments over and over again
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:04:53 +0100
Source: ghostscript
Architecture: source
Version: 9.53.3~dfsg-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Printing Team
Changed-By: Jonas Smedegaard
Closes: 972896
Chan
Your message dated Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:34:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#972896: fixed in ghostscript 9.53.3~dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #972896,
regarding libgs9-common: please relax the dependency on fonts-urw-base35
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
ghostscript_9.53.3~dfsg-5_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ghostscript_9.53.3~dfsg-5.dsc
ghostscript_9.53.3~dfsg-5.debian.tar.xz
ghostscript_9.53.3~dfsg-5_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Quoting Fabian Greffrath (2020-10-26 10:13:41)
> Am 2020-10-26 09:56, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> > You cannot mean to sugges that ghostscript should violate Debian
> > Policy by ignoring the integrity of symlinks, so it must be
> > something else. Please elaborate what you have in mind.
>
> *Si
Am 2020-10-26 09:56, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
You cannot mean to sugges that ghostscript should violate Debian Policy
by ignoring the integrity of symlinks, so it must be something else.
Please elaborate what you have in mind.
*Sigh!*
Please reconsider letting unrelated packages migrate to te
Quoting Fabian Greffrath (2020-10-26 09:38:58)
> Am 2020-10-25 22:48, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> > It seems to me that the concrete delay is caused by ghostscript in
> > _testing_ having tight dependency on the font, and that it therefore
> > cannot be solved by an upload to unstable - only by gho
Am 2020-10-25 22:48, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
It seems to me that the concrete delay is caused by ghostscript in
_testing_ having tight dependency on the font, and that it therefore
cannot be solved by an upload to unstable - only by ghostscript
migrating to testing (or ghostscript getting kicke
12 matches
Mail list logo
