Package: cups
Version: 1.7.5-5
I really don't have much detail here but it's certainly strange.
This happened about 1 hour after upgrading from 1.7.5-4+b1 to 1.7.5-5
when I had to print something.
As a side note, I'm not quite sure why this broke my system (the mkstemp
and gpgv failures shown
59706, and
renaming it to [officejet_pro_8710] as the log suggests. That works fine.
Regards,
Gedalya
On 11/22/2017 01:46 PM, Brian Potkin wrote:
> I forgot to ask: is scanning successful if, instead of duplicating the
> section. you just delete the "hp_" from [hp_officejet_pro_8710]?
Yes, same effect.
On 11/21/2017 08:09 PM, Brian Potkin wrote:
>
> Hello Gedalya. Thank you for your report. I forwarded it upstream and
> now you will see there is a reply. Please would you respond to that
> message there as I am unable to speak for you.
I'll look into that. Thank you!
>
&g
On 11/23/2017 01:37 PM, Brian Potkin wrote:
>
>> Note: In order to produce this, I need to stop cupsd. Somehow, at some
>> point sane started finding the scanner via CUPS, the printer being
>> configured there.
> I take this to mean you configured the printer with something like
> hp-setup and the
On 11/23/2017 05:44 PM, Brian Potkin wrote:
> On Thu 23 Nov 2017 at 14:05:38 +0100, Gedalya wrote:
>
>> On 11/23/2017 01:37 PM, Brian Potkin wrote:
>>>> Note: In order to produce this, I need to stop cupsd. Somehow, at some
>>>> point sane started finding the
On 11/23/2017 09:08 PM, Brian Potkin wrote:
>
>>> So where does scanimage get the uri from when cups is running? From the
>>> Bonjour broadcasts? What happens when you deactivate broadcasting on the
>>> printer?
>> I don't know how to do that.
> Go to http://192.168.9.238 with a browser. Look under
On 11/23/2017 09:08 PM, Brian Potkin wrote:
>>> This device-uri should also be given by hp-makeuri. Would you confirm
>>> this and check printing takes place.
>> This in fact works only with the original models.dat, with the hp_ prefix:
> That in itself should indicate something to you.
>
I get th
On 11/30/2017 03:11 PM, Brian Potkin wrote:
> I wonder how you would go on with the queue
>
>
> lpadmin -p 4500 hp:/net/envy_4500_series?ip=192.168.9.238 -E -m
> drv:///hpcups.drv/hp_envy_4500_series.ppd\
lpadmin: Unknown argument "hp:/net/envy_4500_series?ip=192.168.9.238".
not sure where to g
On 11/30/2017 11:19 PM, Brian Potkin wrote:
lpadmin -p 4500 -v hp:/net/envy_4500_series?ip=192.168.9.238 -E -m
drv:///hpcups.drv/hp_envy_4500_series.ppd\
^
^
We both have access to the same manual. :)
You're right. But I'm just not following most of wh
On 12/01/2017 05:51 PM, Brian Potkin wrote:
>
> I would appreciate that you do one re-test. Depending on the outcome, I
> think we will see light at the end of the tunnel. :)
>
> You report:
>
> > When cupsd is running and the AIO is configured as a printer
> > in CUPS, this issue does not occur.
On 12/01/2017 05:51 PM, Brian Potkin wrote:
> > With CUPS running, or with models.dat edited:
> >$ scanimage -L
> > device `hpaio:/net/officejet_pro_8710?ip=192.168.9.238&queue=false' is a
> Hewlett-Packard officejet_pro_8710 all-in-one
And now, with cupsd running and Bonjour enabled:
device
On 12/01/2017 07:05 PM, Brian Potkin wrote:
> How does that sound?
In terms of gut-feeling / speculation, we have arrived at what was obvious to
me when opening this bug.
> (It does not look at the broadcasts when the print queue is operative).
The same lines get printed to syslog, so it does
On 12/01/2017 02:04 PM, Brian Potkin wrote:
Sorry; another typo. It's drv:///hpcups.drv/hp-envy_4500_series.ppd
OK, finally I get:
device `hpaio:/net/envy_4500_series?ip=192.168.9.238' is a
Hewlett-Packard envy_4500_series all-in-one
You are definitely not wasting my time. I'm unsure wheth
On 11/11/18 1:07 AM, Brian Potkin wrote:
> Gedalya, if you are on unstable please upgrade to 3.18.10+dfsg0-2. If
> you are on testing, install libsane-hpaio from unstable. This is the
> only package you need for scanning; it will overwrite models.dat.
>
> How do you go on now?
15 matches
Mail list logo
