ist using ghostscript
9.05~dfsg-6 and evince-gtk 3.4.0-2+b1:
jonas@atreju:~$ evince test.pdf
Entity: line 9: parser error : xmlParseCharRef: invalid xmlChar value 6
.com/xap/1.0/mm/'
xapMM:DocumentID='uuid:6573824f-4ee4-11ec--7897baf4782
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard -
e/droid/DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf
>
> WTH is really going on here?
Oh. You are right!
Fixed in git now. Unfortunately doesn't make Ghostscript use that Font
:-(
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
myself, just easier if you have it already).
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 12-03-01 at 01:44pm, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On 12-03-01 at 08:54am, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
> >> In general, I think useless dangling symlinks are a bug even if
> >> they don't cause tangible harm, just as for example documen
t, the
> ability to make an automatic substitution will be valuable for those
> merely viewing or proofing such files.
...and that's another Policy-mandated bug: Long description should
document the relevancy of optional parts IIRC.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist &
mon) ?
>
> (Or should we not remove gs-common yet ?)
Quite sensible!
I am preparing a new release now.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
dination, and for those it makes
sense to use experimental as staging area - but let's keep the
transition the least complex as possible, as that also helps ease
migrations from older to newer releases of both Debian and derived
distros.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist &
n of dh_*
> scripts with multibinary packages.
>
> Attach patch to fix it.
Ahh, good catch! Thanks a lot for that patch.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing
whole range of other headers
similarly gets wrongly treated as missing on multiarch systems, possibly
causing problems other than FTBFS.
I imagine the proper (i.e. least intrusive) aproach is to check each use
of $(INCLUDE) and if relocated on multiarch systems then replace with a
multiarch path
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:28:01 +0200
Source: ijs
Binary: libijs-dev libijs-0.35
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.35-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Printing Team
Changed-By: Jonas Smedegaard
Description
downstream of Debian: For any matters involving more than
local context work with upstream if at all possible rather than fork!
Kind regards,
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] as
.
Thanks!
Applied to git.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 11-07-07 at 03:23pm, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 01:47:30AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On 11-06-09 at 11:51pm, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > There is an upcoming libjpeg transition from libjpeg62 to
> > > libjpeg8. As mentionned on debia
k at that immediately.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
calls it. HÃ¥kon did the brave thing and tried omitting the Interp3D
> call, and it seemed to work okay.
>
> So it's all a little puzzling. Hints welcome.
Ghostscript recently added support for LittleCMS 2.x which I hope to
soon use instead of LittleCMS 1.x.
Thanks to all of
few hours - and if all goes well
then enter Debian testing after 10 days.
Kind regards,
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 11-04-18 at 07:30pm, Colin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > So please try with 9.02 and tell if the problem persist there. If
> > it does, then please install the ghostscript-dbg package and post a
> > gdb trace here to the bu
gdb
trace here to the bugreport. Please also include the EPS files that
trigger the bug and the gs command which triggers it.
Kind regards,
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask
On 11-04-14 at 05:16pm, Daniel Stender wrote:
> Note: problem vanishes with Ghostscript/Libgs 9.02.
Good to hear. Thanks for reporting about it!
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely
o instead link against the
shared system library instead as intended. This should be fixed with
Ghostscript 9.0.2~dfsg-1 just uploaded a moment ago. Please test if
that works.
That one is also a new upstream release, with bugfixes related to color
calibration, so even if it works now and n
their own release tarballs.
Seems to me you just provided its most true source, then :-)
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Descri
st Practice(tm) to
favor true source over indirection like redistribution bia Ghostscript.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:48:49PM +0100, fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am 18.02.2011 11:33, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
There is currently a discussion on gs-devel to merge the urwcyr
1.0.7pre44 fonts that Debian ships in their gsfonts package into the
fonts that ghostscript ships:
<h
not adapt Debian packaged for
compatibility with non-Debian packages - but will be happy to help any
fork of Debian improve to become less forkish.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely
by Kenshi Muto that this indirection was no longer
needed. But I can very well be mistaken.
Regards,
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 08:53:04AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 23:40 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Could you try build upstream code but remove icclib subdir, to see if
that triggers same bug?
I've built HEAD master with the folder removed and it seems to work
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 10:31:38PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 12:31 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>I tried to rebuild the debian package but it doesn't seem to support
>DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
Whoops. If that is true, it is a bug in itself!
Did you a
tminimal pieces are
needed to extract and include in that -dbg package and where to put it
(I believe I saw somewhere that there's a trick of putting -dbg libs in
a subdir which makes it extend (not replace) the normal package and get
used if available).
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard -
should also be fixed in unstable!), and to
my surprise I'd only ripped out the icclib subdir but not added the
needed patches or build-dependency to make it instead use the separately
maintained libicc library. :-(
Working on that now...
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist &
bove failure tried against...
some release of Debian package (with patches applied)
current head of Debian package development (with patches applied)
some upstream release
some snapshot of upstream development
?
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf
th this patch applied?
No need - I can grab it from the bugreport.
Thanks, everyone!
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Des
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:43:57AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 18.02.2011 11:33, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
There are multiple reasons, e.g. historical packaging complications,
historical packaging cleanup complications, and the fact that upstream
treat external codebases as local sources
latter causing additional
burden of our side of analysing and ripping apart the various parts
again.
I agree, however, with the message between the lines of your question:
There is no _sensible_ reason :-)
So thanks for pointing this out! It is indeed a bug.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 09:33:04PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
My first two CDBS questions:
- how can I list the makefiles involved in building a given
target (e.g., debian/control)? How does one find the corresponding
documentation for those files?
I simply
haven't investigated myself.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ave no time to deal with mere mortals" but more that
I really love the way CDBS uses make and dislike how short-form dh
reinvents make with its core "redirect any build target to debhelper"
trick. So feel free to ask questions about CDBS, and don't expect to
convince me that
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 08:42:56PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
At Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:52:55 +0100,
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>Unfortunately because at this time (will be till summer) I'm in
>terrible busy, feel free to modify it.
Good. I will take care of that, then, and of these conc
that way - even if you may feel it cumbersome to work with CDBS,
abandoning it implies me loosing interest in this packaging.
Great!
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reu
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 07:08:52PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
Hi all,
At Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:59:59 +0100,
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 09:27:59PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
>This seems to me an example where you want Recommends: instead of
>Depends:
I fully agree wi
Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 04:43:33PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
* Stop custom-handling upstream-shipped patch noise or autotools
files: Properly shipped upstream now.
Stop build-depending on autotools-dev or autoconf.
Hmm, does this mean that supporting
ijs helps me remember. As does an email like
this: Thanks! :-)
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
where credit is due (and you sure are quite involved!). I
will however prefer to sync as much as at all possible with upstream.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing
it on your
behalf.
Kind regards, and good luck with whatever your time is spent on now,
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Descri
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 07:58:12PM +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote:
On 01/25/2011 10:04 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I think perhaps you miss my point:
If libijs is maintained for Debian as part of the GPL Ghostscript
project, and we also (in the future) maintain GNU Ghostscript, then
GNU
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:58:35PM +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote:
On 01/25/2011 08:27 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Another argument for keeping libijs separate:
I consider packaging GNU Ghostscript, which seem to have a slightly
different development pace and thus might be interesting e.g. for
ns as part of GPL
Ghostscript or not, but whether we should maintain a library separately
which is _usable_ seaparately.
- Jonas
P.S. Please do not cc me privately - I am subscribed to the Printing
Team list (and cc'ing me slightly screws up my mail handling).
--
* Jonas Smedeg
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 06:59:08PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 08:47:07PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hi Till (and others),
I took the liberty of moving this conversation to the Debian Printing
Team and cc ijs package maintainer.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 08:12:31PM
Hi Hideki,
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:25:20AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:49:47 +0100
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Cc'ing package maintainer of poppler-data...!
Hi, Jonas. Long time no see from NYC :)
Duplicated code in Debian is a problem.
Yes, yes. I know po
ella. You need only reply to this email with a list
of packages you are ok with group-maintaining, then I volunteer to do
the actual move. You are of course more than welcome to keep
contributing in your own pace :-)
At Tue, 25 Jan 2011 01:38:03 +0100,
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:30:31PM +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote:
On 01/24/2011 09:04 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I noticed that recent Ghostscript packaging for [Ubuntu] dropped the
indirection of CMap files.
I am not knowledgeable in DeFoMa, but recent changelog entry of
gs-cjk-resource
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:20:59PM +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote:
On 01/24/2011 10:11 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Filing a bugreport also helps in resolving if perhaps ijs package
maintainer might be MIA...
According to
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/i/ijs/ijs_0.35-7/changelog
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:29:26PM +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote:
On 01/24/2011 08:47 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I think that a) ijs package should cherry-pick from ghostscript
sources (manually, from upstream tarballs and/or VCS), and b) ijs
package maintainers (or anyone, really - perhaps
affect users of
gs-cjk-resource? If so, please elaborate on what more detailed this
change consist of, so that I might adopt it for the Debian packaging.
Regards,
- Jonas
[Ubuntu]:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/9.01~dfsg~svn12005-0ubuntu1
--
* Jonas Smedegaard
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
201 - 255 of 255 matches
Mail list logo