Le samedi, 24 novembre 2012 15.17:44, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
wrote:
> > I remembered this bug and noticed it was fixed, but "badly": do you
> > intend to upload the "nice" cups-postinst-trigger solution to Wheezy?
> >
> > I still think
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 18.03:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
>> > > For Wheezy we should probably aim for the uglier but much simpler
>> > > solution. the "master" branch is not intended for Wheezy, I will
>> > > us
Hi Jonas,
Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 18.03:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > > For Wheezy we should probably aim for the uglier but much simpler
> > > solution. the "master" branch is not intended for Wheezy, I will
> > > use a separate "master-wheezy" for that.
> >
> > I think I disagree. Th
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-07-30 at 10:03pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Jonas Smedegaard
>> wrote:
>> > On 12-07-29 at 09:04pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
>> >> Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 18.03:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écr
On 12-07-30 at 10:03pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Jonas Smedegaard
> wrote:
> > On 12-07-29 at 09:04pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> >> Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 18.03:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> >> > > > For Wheezy we should probably aim for the uglier
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-07-29 at 09:04pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
>> Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 18.03:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
>> > > > For Wheezy we should probably aim for the uglier but much
>> > > > simpler solution. the "master" branch is
On 12-07-29 at 09:04pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 18.03:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > > > For Wheezy we should probably aim for the uglier but much
> > > > simpler solution. the "master" branch is not intended for
> > > > Wheezy, I will use a separate "maste
Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 18.03:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > > For Wheezy we should probably aim for the uglier but much simpler
> > > solution. the "master" branch is not intended for Wheezy, I will
> > > use a separate "master-wheezy" for that.
> >
> > I think I disagree. The patch I p
On 12-07-29 at 05:07pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 15.17:39, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > On 12-07-29 at 02:20pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > > A nice solution to this bug is IMHO to replicate in
> > > ghostscript-cups what has been done for most packages ship
On 12-07-29 at 05:10pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 15.40:19, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > On 12-07-29 at 02:33pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > > Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 14.20:45, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a
> > > écrit :
> > > > A nice solution to this bug is I
Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 15.40:19, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> On 12-07-29 at 02:33pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 14.20:45, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit :
> > > A nice solution to this bug is IMHO to replicate in ghostscript-cups
> > > what has been done for m
Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 15.17:39, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> On 12-07-29 at 02:20pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > A nice solution to this bug is IMHO to replicate in ghostscript-cups
> > what has been done for most packages shipping Cups drivers: transform
> > the postinst code into a dpk
On 12-07-29 at 02:33pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 14.20:45, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit :
> > A nice solution to this bug is IMHO to replicate in ghostscript-cups
> > what has been done for most packages shipping Cups drivers:
> > transform the postinst code into
On 12-07-29 at 02:20pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le vendredi, 27 juillet 2012 14.23:27, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > severity 520753 serious
> > thanks
> >
> > On 12-07-27 at 11:48am, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > > Bug 520753 is about a faillure in postinst script when
> > > /etc/cups/ppd
Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 14.20:45, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit :
> A nice solution to this bug is IMHO to replicate in ghostscript-cups what
> has been done for most packages shipping Cups drivers: transform the
> postinst code into a dpkg trigger and let the Cups postinst do the job "as
> cup
Le vendredi, 27 juillet 2012 14.23:27, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> severity 520753 serious
> thanks
>
> On 12-07-27 at 11:48am, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > Bug 520753 is about a faillure in postinst script when /etc/cups/ppd
> > is not present. i am tented to raise this bug as serious, because t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 520753 serious
Bug #520753 [ghostscript-cups] postinst couldn't change to /etc/cups/pppd
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
520753: http://bugs.debian.
severity 520753 serious
thanks
On 12-07-27 at 11:48am, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> Bug 520753 is about a faillure in postinst script when /etc/cups/ppd
> is not present. i am tented to raise this bug as serious, because ti
> could break install.
Agreed.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - ideal
tags 520753 + patch
reasign 520753 ghostscript-cups
severity important
thanks
Hi,
Bug 520753 is about a faillure in postinst script when /etc/cups/ppd
is not present. i am tented to raise this bug as serious, because ti
could break install.
What is your opinion ?
Bastien
fix-cups-dir-in-post
19 matches
Mail list logo
