Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> Your own tests indicate that indeed a newer gs is a fix for this bug.
> Please, however, let's discuss only the actual bug in this bugreport.
Sure. I just didn't want others to waste time trying to debug something
that has been fixed upstream.
> A separate bugreport
Hi Sanjoy,
Quoting Sanjoy Mahajan (2013-12-18 19:51:21)
> Thus, as a fix (or workaround for a somewhat dubious pdf file), could
> gs be upgraded to 9.10?
Thanks for filing this bugreport.
Your own tests indicate that indeed a newer gs is a fix for this bug.
Please, however, let's discuss only
