On Sun 08 Mar 2015 at 21:00:25 +0900, Tomoo Nomura wrote:
> My god!
> The problem disappeared from current Jessie.
> I'm not sure when it did disappear.
>
> I try to degrade the system to cups_1.7.1-12_amd64.deb and related
> packages, but I couldn't reproduce the problem.
>
> Anyway, I tested o
Brian,
My god!
The problem disappeared from current Jessie.
I'm not sure when it did disappear.
I try to degrade the system to cups_1.7.1-12_amd64.deb and related
packages, but I couldn't reproduce the problem.
Anyway, I tested on current Jessie.
1. *LandscapeOrientation: Plus90
This made
On Sun 08 Mar 2015 at 10:24:41 +0900, Tomoo Nomura wrote:
> Attached is the ppd I am using. Both wheezy's and Jessie's are the same.
> The original ppd provided by Brother has some problems and I
> modified some numbers in ImageableArea and PaperDimension.
Please add somewhere at the start of the
Brian,
Attached is the ppd I am using. Both wheezy's and Jessie's are the same.
The original ppd provided by Brother has some problems and I modified
some numbers in ImageableArea and PaperDimension.
Regards,
Tomoo
On 03/08/2015 09:50 AM, Brian Potkin wrote:
reassign 779178 cups-filters-cup
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 779178 cups-filters-core-drivers
Bug #779178 [cups-filters] pdftopdf does not handle the landscape option
correctly
Bug reassigned from package 'cups-filters' to 'cups-filters-core-drivers'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bu
reassign 779178 cups-filters-cups-drivers
thanks
On Fri 06 Mar 2015 at 22:41:19 +, Brian Potkin wrote:
> I was wary about approaching this bug because most of my printing is
> done from the command line. After looking at the outputs of printing
> from evince, iceweasel, okular and libreoff
On Thu 05 Mar 2015 at 12:14:00 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Brian Potkin (2015-03-04 17:09:17)
> > I am having doubts that a solution with orientation-requested will
> > meet with success as landscape printing in testing for PDFs appears to
> > be broken.
>
> Could it perhaps be tha
Quoting Brian Potkin (2015-03-04 17:09:17)
> I am having doubts that a solution with orientation-requested will
> meet with success as landscape printing in testing for PDFs appears to
> be broken.
Could it perhaps be that the rotation was expressed as non-integer?
Ghostscript project just made
severity 779178 important
retitle 779178 pdftopdf does not handle the landscape option correctly
thanks
On Tue 03 Mar 2015 at 13:50:25 +0900, Tomoo Nomura wrote:
> Hello Brian,
Hello Tomoo,
Please do not forget to include the bug (779...@bugs.debian.org) when
you reply. Mails to only me have
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 779178 important
Bug #779178 [cups-filters] ghostscript: Landscape document rotate CCW not CW
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
> retitle 779178 pdftopdf does not handle the landscape option correctly
Bug #779178 [cups-filters] gh
10 matches
Mail list logo
