Quoting Ivo De Decker (2018-10-21 14:28:37)
> On 10/21/18 1:06 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Jonas Smedegaard, le dim. 21 oct. 2018 12:56:02 +0200, a ecrit:
> >> I am clueless why that happens. Not sure, but I suspect it is a
> >> spurious error happening occationally and if so that a workaround
Jonas Smedegaard, le dim. 21 oct. 2018 12:56:02 +0200, a ecrit:
> I am clueless why that happens. Not sure, but I suspect it is a
> spurious error happening occationally and if so that a workaround is
> to simply request a binNMU.
>
> Help dearly appreciated either requesting a binNMU (by someo
Control: tags -1 help
Hi Ivo,
Quoting Ivo De Decker (2018-10-21 12:08:43)
> The latest version of ghostscript in unstable fails on amd64, i386:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ghostscript
Thanks for reporting!
I am clueless why that happens. Not sure, but I suspect it is a
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 help
Bug #911522 [src:ghostscript] ghostscript: FTBFS on amd64, i386
Added tag(s) help.
--
911522: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=911522
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
package: src:ghostscript
version: 9.25~dfsg-4
severity: serious
tags: ftbfs
Hi,
The latest version of ghostscript in unstable fails on amd64, i386:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ghostscript
Cheers,
Ivo