Re: Ghostscript 9.18 packaging

2016-02-11 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2016-02-11 14:19:46) > Quoting Damian Dimmich (2016-02-11 13:56:17) > > So, following your advice I've added the variable in - this gets us > > much of the way there, although still fails to build cups., and with > > cups disabled, uses the wrong -llib_openjpeg which sho

Re: Ghostscript 9.18 packaging

2016-02-11 Thread Damian Dimmich
Really excited about your helping out here - hope you are here to stay! :-) - Jonas I'll probably be around as work requires it - we process thousands of pdf's a week (sometimes 4-5k/day) so I need this to work !! :) D

Re: Ghostscript 9.18 packaging

2016-02-11 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Damian Dimmich (2016-02-11 13:56:17) > Yes - hit the wrong button - meant to write to the list. > > So, following your advice I've added the variable in - this gets us > much of the way there, although still fails to build cups., and with > cups disabled, uses the wrong -llib_openjpeg wh

Re: Ghostscript 9.18 packaging

2016-02-11 Thread Damian Dimmich
Hi Jonas, Yes - hit the wrong button - meant to write to the list. So, following your advice I've added the variable in - this gets us much of the way there, although still fails to build cups., and with cups disabled, uses the wrong -llib_openjpeg which should be -lopenjpeg in the .tr files,

Re: Ghostscript 9.18 packaging

2016-02-10 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
[replying via public list, assuming simple error] Quoting Damian Dimmich (2016-02-10 11:43:38) > Update regarding the issue - in base/tiff.mak $(TIFFCONFIG_H) and > $(TIFFCONF_H) are both incorrectly configured and point to > /libtiff/tiff_config.h and /libtiff/tiffconfig.h respectively (neither

Re: Ghostscript 9.18 packaging

2016-02-09 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Damian Dimmich (2016-02-09 21:04:59) > Thanks for the help again - have now been able to reproduce your tiff > issue. Progress :) > > Will have a stab at getting something working tomorrow! Great! Regarding build environment: You might also consider these: eatmydata ccache (and ccontr

Re: Ghostscript 9.18 packaging

2016-02-09 Thread Damian Dimmich
Hi Jonas, Thanks for the help again - have now been able to reproduce your tiff issue. Progress :) Will have a stab at getting something working tomorrow! Damian On 09/02/2016 22:25, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Hi Damian, Did you subscribe to debian-printing@lists.debian.org yet? Quoting Dam

Re: Ghostscript 9.18 packaging

2016-02-09 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Damian, Did you subscribe to debian-printing@lists.debian.org yet? Quoting Damian Dimmich (2016-02-09 18:53:42) > I'm actually stuck a bit earlier on in the process - running $ > fakeroot debian/rules build hangs. I recommend that you use the wrapper command "debuild" instead, to ensure bas

Re: Ghostscript 9.18 packaging

2016-02-09 Thread Damian Dimmich
Hi Jonas! Thank you so much! Have pulled your latest changes. I'm actually stuck a bit earlier on in the process - running $ fakeroot debian/rules build hangs. cp ./soobj/sjbig2_jbig2dec.dev ./soobj/sjbig2.dev make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'soobj/sjpx_.dev', needed by 'soobj/sjpx.dev'

Re: Ghostscript 9.18 packaging

2016-02-09 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Damian, Quoting Damian Dimmich (2016-02-09 08:36:29) > I've encountered an issue with GS 9.16 where it fails to render some > of my customers pdf's correctly into PNG's. > > 9.18 seems to resolve the issue. I saw on the Ghostscript package > tracker that there was already a note to suggest

Ghostscript 9.18 packaging

2016-02-09 Thread Damian Dimmich
Hello! I've encountered an issue with GS 9.16 where it fails to render some of my customers pdf's correctly into PNG's. 9.18 seems to resolve the issue. I saw on the Ghostscript package tracker that there was already a note to suggest packaging the new version. Is someone already working o

Re: Ghostscript 9.18

2015-10-12 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Till, Quoting Till Kamppeter (2015-10-12 18:21:00) > Can you also apply the patches referred to in comment #22 of > > http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696246 Done, thanks! Please consider file bugreports for issues like this. Brief ones like these are fine - my point is not (nec

Re: Ghostscript 9.18

2015-10-12 Thread Till Kamppeter
On 10/10/2015 02:30 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Will do. Thanks! - Jonas Can you also apply the patches referred to in comment #22 of http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696246 Thanks. Till

Re: Ghostscript 9.18

2015-10-09 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Till Kamppeter (2015-10-10 00:34:48) > when packaging Ghostscript 9.18 please apply the patches which fix this bug: > > http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696246 > > Comments #14 and #16 > > http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff

Ghostscript 9.18

2015-10-09 Thread Till Kamppeter
Hi, when packaging Ghostscript 9.18 please apply the patches which fix this bug: http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696246 Comments #14 and #16 http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=b68e05c3 http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=95553954 They