Re: Size of Debian a Problem? Forget it!

1999-10-20 Thread Colin Walters
On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 09:51:49PM +0200, Juergen A. Erhard wrote: There's this current thread on the size of Debian's ftp archive (started with someone noting the size of `gmt-coast-full', ~47M) I think this is a moot discussion... just look at disk prize these days. Here in Germany, a 20M

Re: Data does NOT belong in Debian (was: Stop Archive bloat)

1999-10-20 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 11:00:14PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote: On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 09:43:57PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: Why not allow Source only packages ? That will win nothing. You can't use apt-get on them, have to rebuilt and have them twice locally. $ apt-get source -b

Re: Data does NOT belong in Debian (was: Stop Archive bloat)

1999-10-20 Thread Julian Gilbey
Philippe Troin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 1) The way the Debian archive works requires the data to be stored twice (source package and .deb). Why not allow Source only packages ? Or have a small .deb which installs the data and the data as a tar.gz/tar.bz2 file which is symlinked

Re: Data does NOT belong in Debian (was: Stop Archive bloat)

1999-10-20 Thread Fabien Ninoles
On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 11:37:06PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote: On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 07:10:09PM + , Zygo Blaxell wrote: On 18 Oct 1999 18:16:58 -0700, Philippe Troin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] 3) Where do we stop ? As someone says, there's nothing preventing me from uploading

Re: Data does NOT belong in Debian (was: Stop Archive bloat)

1999-10-20 Thread Gerhard Poul
Hi, NO!! RFCs are *very* important when writing software. They are the standards upon which a large amount of free software is based and are absolutely crucial to developers. Why should they have to hunt the web for such stuff? I think it's possible for _everyone_ to mirror (for example)

Re: Data does NOT belong in Debian (was: Stop Archive bloat)

1999-10-20 Thread Zygo Blaxell
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999 14:06:50 +1000, Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote: On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 11:00:14PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote: On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 09:43:57PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: Why not allow Source only packages ? That will win nothing. You can't use

Re: Data does NOT belong in Debian (was: Stop Archive bloat)

1999-10-20 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi, NO!! RFCs are *very* important when writing software. They are the standards upon which a large amount of free software is based and are absolutely crucial to developers. Why should they have to hunt the web for such stuff? I think it's possible for _everyone_ to mirror (for

Re: Data does NOT belong in Debian (was: Stop Archive bloat)

1999-10-20 Thread Christian Surchi
On 19-Oct-99 Torsten Landschoff wrote: That will win nothing. You can't use apt-get on them, have to rebuilt and have them twice locally. Yes, but the problem is the mirrors space, not the space on users disks. --- Christian Surchi, [EMAIL PROTECTED], www.firenze.linux.it/~csurchi

Re: Data does NOT belong in Debian (was: Stop Archive bloat)

1999-10-20 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 09:43:57PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: Why not allow Source only packages ? That will win nothing. You can't use apt-get on them, have to rebuilt and have them twice locally. You could set the arch flag in the