Isn´t base everything thats on the base.tgz file?
I allways thought so.
While your at killing the base section, kill the other sections
also. Its all a bloody mess. Graphics stuff is in libs, x11 stuff in
games, some dev packages are in dev, some in lib some somewhere else.
Just some examples:
Edward Brocklesby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[1 text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)]
Hi,
The attached document details a modification written by Zephaniah E. Hull
and I, which I am proposing as an amendment to the Debian Constitution.
This hopefully solves one or two problems we have identified in
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 01:45:17AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
Just some examples: Why are devscripts in util and not in devel? Aren´t
they for developement?
devscripts (2.1.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Moved package from utils to devel (closes: #33410)
-- Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Goswin Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I see it there are several sortings mixed:
priority: thats why theres base
interface: X11
Yes, I like this one. I would love to see packages with a list of
included interfaces. How about a quick brain storm on a list of
possible interfaces:
Yann Dirson writes:
Goswin Brederlow writes:
interface: X11
Ah, glad you tell this. I already suggested this some time ago but
did not get much support then. More on this in another thread - let's
separate issues.
We should probably define a set of keywords for this. Problem
Goswin Brederlow writes:
Isn´t base everything thats on the base.tgz file?
I allways thought so.
I guess it was at some time, but not any more.
While your at killing the base section, kill the other sections
also. Its all a bloody mess. Graphics stuff is in libs, x11 stuff in
games,
6 matches
Mail list logo
