Decklin Foster writes:
>Is there a compelling reasoon to make this hierarchical? Why not just
>have a plain old list such as:
>
>text, console, xlib, xaw, motif, gtk, qt, web.
That would make it difficult to refer to "all x11 apps", whereas using
hierarchical makes it trivial. We stick more to
Daniel Burrows write:
> No, there definitely need to be a *lot* more categories based on what a
> program is or does
I agree, but the official frontend is still dselect AFAIK, and it is
not able as-is to handle deeper hierarchies in a satisfactory manner.
This will probably come with modern fron
Richard Braakman writes:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 11:01:07PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> > I cannot find a reason currently for its existance, nor can I find a
> > reference to it in the Policy and Packaging manuals.
>
> I see no reason for it either.
>
> > If there's no (more) reason, I
Goswin Brederlow writes:
> Of cause main guis should be mentioned, but something like gnome woult
> be x11/gnome and the first two level would be exactly spezified and
> relevant. But the third level specifying what subtype of a gui is used
> is probably irrelevant to the user and could be op
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin Brederlow writes:
> > > > Interface: tty (stdio, dialog), X11 (Xt, Qt)
> > >
> > > Problem I see: we can't sub-classify Xaw and Motif from Xt with such a
> > > syntax.
> >
> > Interface: X11 (Xt (Xaw))
> [...]
> > A Syntax with brackets wo
5 matches
Mail list logo
