Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin Brederlow writes:
> > Of cause main guis should be mentioned, but something like gnome woult
> > be x11/gnome and the first two level would be exactly spezified and
> > relevant. But the third level specifying what subtype of a gui is used
> >
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 09:28:47PM +0100, Yann Dirson was heard to say:
> > Hmm. That sounds somewhat reasonable, except that I don't see how it
> maps
> > to a usable hierarchy -- it seems like you'd get an incredible mess if you
> > tried to represent it. Could you maybe be a little more
Darren O. Benham writes:
> Is this, basicly, a part of policy now?
As stated earlier...
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 11:01:07PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> > > > I cannot find a reason currently for its existance, nor can I find a
> > > > reference to it in the Policy and Packaging manua
Daniel Burrows writes:
> > > -> File Formats, a listing of all file formats the program can
> > > manipulate,
> > > possibly restricted to some common ones and catch-alls,
> >
> > This could be investigated using the "language/translator" model I
> > succintly depicted in Message-ID:
On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 09:58:35PM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > About "daemon" interface, I'd rather classify a daemon as "Nature:
> > server; ClientInterface: whatever-if-useful". I see 2 orthogonal
> > issues here.
>
> Hmm. Most daemons don't come packaged with a client, and clients can
Is this, basicly, a part of policy now?
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 12:03:44AM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> Richard Braakman writes:
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 11:01:07PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> > > I cannot find a reason currently for its existance, nor can I find a
> > > reference to it in
On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 11:37:50PM +0100, Yann Dirson was heard to say:
>
> Daniel Burrows write:
> > No, there definitely need to be a *lot* more categories based on what a
> > program is or does
>
> I agree, but the official frontend is still dselect AFAIK, and it is
> not able as-is to handle
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 12:03:44AM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> Also maybe a lintian test can be written to print an error on
> "Section: base". Any volunteer for this one ?
I'd say taking 'base' out of 'known_sections' should be sufficient.
BTW: why is the lintian 'unkown-section' tag only Type:
8 matches
Mail list logo