Re: base dependency warning

1999-12-05 Thread Darren O. Benham
On Sun, Dec 05, 1999 at 10:58:55PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: > Darren O. Benham writes: > > Please be aware that console-tools is in base but > > the dependency console-data (>> 1999.08.29-3) > > can not be met with packages in base. > > > > This should be a release critical bug. However, th

Re: Submitting bugs ? (Was: Getting rid of section "base" ?)

1999-12-05 Thread Richard Braakman
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 12:03:44AM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: > base-files admin ? misc ? > base-passwd admin ? misc ? I think we can keep a section named "base". Some packages, like the above, as well as the kernel packages, fit naturally into that section. We just drop the r

Re: Submitting bugs ? (Was: Getting rid of section "base" ?)

1999-12-05 Thread Richard Braakman
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 12:30:41AM +0100, Thomas Schoepf wrote: > On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 12:03:44AM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: > > Also maybe a lintian test can be written to print an error on > > "Section: base". Any volunteer for this one ? > > I'd say taking 'base' out of 'known_sections' shou