Re: Proposed change to Debian constitution

1999-12-29 Thread Martin Schulze
Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > What are the reasons for ever not letting new maintainers in? > > There are none, I agree. > > I'm very disappointed that Wichert has failed to reopen New > Maintainer. This is the biggest failure of his tenure thus far,

Re: Proposed change to Debian constitution

1999-12-29 Thread Decklin Foster
Peter S Galbraith writes: > Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > I'm very disappointed that Wichert has failed to reopen New > > Maintainer. This is the biggest failure of his tenure thus far, IMHO. > > I could not agree more. Me too. -- Written with 100% free software. Please support the following we

Re: Proposed change to Debian constitution

1999-12-29 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Adam Di Carlo wrote: > I'm very disappointed that Wichert has failed to reopen New > Maintainer. This is the biggest failure of his tenure thus far, IMHO. I could not agree more. Peter -- Peter Galbraith, research scientist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Maurice Lamontagne Institute, Department

Re: Proposed change to Debian constitution

1999-12-29 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What are the reasons for ever not letting new maintainers in? There are none, I agree. I'm very disappointed that Wichert has failed to reopen New Maintainer. This is the biggest failure of his tenure thus far, IMHO. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTEC