I'm still hoping that new-maintainer will reopen after potato is
released (I believe several people have said that's the plan)
On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 12:55:07AM -0700, Nate Duehr was heard to say:
> #5 and #6 Folks, if you're being sponsored, you really should get on this
> webpage. Perhaps if
Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > the control file is set up properly. The sponsored party is listed as
> > the "Maintainer" for dpkg purposes; they just can't upload the package
> > themselves.
>
> I didn't realize this. It's interesting that this is how it's being
> handled. I haven
On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 01:44:35AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Some of you may recall I mentioned some time ago that I hoped to have a
> means of finding developers that may have left us, and today I put it
> online! The system is called Echelon (NSA calls theirs that, so can we!)
Sounds nifty
On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 02:30:09AM -0600, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> I don't think the DPL himself chose to halt taking new maintainers.
> My interpretation of what Joey and James have said is that they both
> had concerns about NM that weren't being addressed, and they stopped
> taking applications
Hi all,
Some of you may recall I mentioned some time ago that I hoped to have a
means of finding developers that may have left us, and today I put it
online! The system is called Echelon (NSA calls theirs that, so can we!)
and how it works is by passively monitoring all mailing list traffic and
i
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What process(es) must be followed to start a Debian dist for a new
> architecture??
[...]
> As I can't find any web documentation which describes the process I
> thought i'd gather comments (flames or otherwise) from this group on any
> issues etc which may arise from
6 matches
Mail list logo
