On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 02:51:28PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Sat, 1 Apr 2000, Craig Sanders wrote:
I hope to dismantle the sites mirroring incoming in favor of
direct access, it ultimately will use less bandwidth/cpu.
this is bad. sometimes installing stuff from incoming is
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 11:20:32AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 02:51:28PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Sat, 1 Apr 2000, Craig Sanders wrote:
I hope to dismantle the sites mirroring incoming in favor of
direct access, it ultimately will use less bandwidth/cpu.
On Sun, 2 Apr 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 01:22:12PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 10:39:30PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
If you weren't following unstable on critical machines, maybe that
wouldn't happen. Then again, I guess as a developer, we
On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 11:37:39PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
Yeah...that's it, I'm for getting rid of incoming mirrors to save cpu and
bandwidth on one of our resources...that's so selfish of me. God forbid I
Would it be possible for Incoming to be made avalible via FTP as well as
HTTP? Both
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Mark Brown wrote:
Would it be possible for Incoming to be made avalible via FTP as well as
HTTP? Both can have problems with firewalls and forced proxying, but
I don't think so, ftp is going to remain turned off on that machine. If
you can't fetch things from the web,
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 01:22:12PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
debian 'unstable' is perfectly usable for production servers, using it
for such does not require any more caution about upgrades than using
debian 'stable' or debian 'frozen'.
Like during the Perl transition period, or when a
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Like during the Perl transition period, or when a recent libstdc++
broke apt, or when su stopped being able to su, or when
What you are describing is a problem with the package life cycle, not the
replication of incoming. Let me reiterate:
DO NOT
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
The files may be trojans, corrupt, partial, massively screwed, fail
lintian, whatever. Massive, massive caution is advised!
I thougth that we're in this business for several years now.
Another time warp?
Regards,
Joey
--
Experience is something you don't get
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Mark Brown wrote:
Would it be possible for Incoming to be made avalible via FTP as well as
HTTP? Both can have problems with firewalls and forced proxying, but
I don't think so, ftp is going to remain turned off on that machine. If
you
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 09:46:13AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 01:22:12PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
debian 'unstable' is perfectly usable for production servers, using
it for such does not require any more caution about upgrades than
using debian 'stable' or debian
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 08:49:17PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 09:46:13AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 01:22:12PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
debian 'unstable' is perfectly usable for production servers, using
it for such does not require any
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Craig Sanders writes:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 09:46:13AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 01:22:12PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
debian 'unstable' is perfectly usable for production servers, using
it for such does not require any more caution
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 06:04:25AM +0200, fischer wrote:
On Sun, 2 Apr 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 01:22:12PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 10:39:30PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
If you weren't following unstable on critical machines, maybe that
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 03:48:00AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Like during the Perl transition period, or when a recent libstdc++
broke apt, or when su stopped being able to su, or when
What you are describing is a problem with the
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 03:30:01AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
I don't think so, ftp is going to remain turned off on that machine. If
you can't fetch things from the web, but can via ftp I think you have some
serious 'issues' ;
HTTP tends to be one of the first things that gets forced
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 10:07:02AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
If you are so careful and clueful, why do you need instant access to an
incoming mirror?
to fix the machine(s) i use to test any upgrades. the fact that they are
unimportant enough to test an upgrade on doesn't mean that their entire
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 02:45:12PM +0200, Nils Lohner wrote:
... so why not just package up unstable and release it without fixing
bugs if using them is the same? I think I'm missing something
here. Even if you're cautious, isn't unstable more likely to have
bugs (the RC list comes to mind)
17 matches
Mail list logo
