Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)

2000-07-31 Thread Joey Hess
Dale Scheetz wrote: > I would also ask: Do we want to accept people as members who are unwilling > to show us their face? gpg -kvv espy |grep -v Klecker -- see shy jo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Fear the new maintainer process

2000-07-31 Thread Joey Hess
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > Worse, this was predicted also from the *experience* of sponsoring new > maintainers , not only > from a theoretical analysis. > > The real-size experimentation performed in sponsoring seems to have been > compl

Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)

2000-07-31 Thread Jens Müller
- Original Message - From: "Anand Kumria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Dale Scheetz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Please choose ONE debian-* list! Jens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)

2000-07-31 Thread Anand Kumria
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 03:06:36PM +, Dale Scheetz wrote: > I strongly disagree with the interpretation being made here. think you missing, or overlooking three very important things. > Every applicant must provide an image file of a photograph of themselves, > most desired is a passport or

Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)

2000-07-31 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 03:06:36PM +, Dale Scheetz wrote: > Having the assurance that the keyholder is the applicant (this comes from > the signature on their key) coupled with the signed image provided by the > applicant closes the eye/hand loop. Neither is sufficient without the > other. B

Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)

2000-07-31 Thread Dale Scheetz
I strongly disagree with the interpretation being made here. Every applicant must provide an image file of a photograph of themselves, most desired is a passport or a photo ID, signed with their GPG key, in order to identify themselves to the group. This image is archived by the DAM as the record

Gibraltar project: first pre-release

2000-07-31 Thread Rene Mayrhofer
Hi all I am pleased to announce the first pre-release of the Gibraltar project. It is a Debian-based firewall/router. The software runs completely from a bootable, live CD-ROM that contains everything needed to build a firewall/router. Log files can be stored on a harddisk partition, configuratio

RE: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fe

2000-07-31 Thread Matthew Vernon
> However, by signing an ID, or the email, I have demonstrated > that I do infact, possess that private key. Well indeed, but I'd expect to get a gpg-signed mail from my applicant as part of step 2, and I could then check the signature. Matthew -- Rapun.sel - outermost outpost of the Pick Em