On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 06:08:36PM +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
Dale Scheetz writes:
I just can't understand the reluctance to satisfy this requirement except
that it is viewed by some as being too hard. I cannot, for the life of me,
You've not been reading my emails then. I don't
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Jim Ziegler wrote:
So out with Kernigan and Ritchie, they had no scanners so could not have
had anything to contribute. (Please be sure to note that this is a
comment on the arrogance of the assumption that one who does not have
convienent access to the latest
On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 02:03:37PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
When I submitted a scan of my Driver's License in early 1998, I used xpaint
or the gimp or something to place black "censorship" rectangles over my
actual driver's license number and social security number. This was
regarded
At 11:09 PM 08/04/2000 +0200, Detlev Zundel wrote:
And as a side note, I've heard that people were able to do stuff for
the GNU project without depositing urine samples, but then again the
GNU project is probably not as respectable as Debian.
Urine, blood, sweat or tears... almost any bodily
Jim Westveer writes:
On 03-Aug-2000 Matthew Vernon wrote:
Dale Scheetz writes:
I just can't understand the reluctance to satisfy this requirement
except
that it is viewed by some as being too hard. I cannot, for the life of
me,
You've not been reading my emails
On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 02:03:37PM -0500, Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote...
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 06:08:36PM +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
When I submitted a scan of my Driver's License in early 1998, I used xpaint
or the gimp or something to place black censorship rectangles over
6 matches
Mail list logo
