Hi, sorry for delay.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on Tue, 12 Sep 2000 21:01:57 +1100,
Anand Kumria [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 10:14:46AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Any ideas what the problem might be?
I don't know the detail, but web site generation process did
have some
At Sat, 16 Sep 2000 21:40:16 +0100,
Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 04:45:25AM +0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
Your PGP signature was bad.
Really? On Wanderlust2/Emacs20, there are no problem.
It shows by pgp verification as follows:
Signature made Sat 16 Sep
one of my applicants has made a package that consists of two upstream
source packages. basically, a set of reports are distributed in a
separate package from the main program. the applicant added the
reports to the original tar file.
seems to me the best way to handle the package is a
On 2917T224252+0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
Does anyone else see my pgp signature was bad?
Yes.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
At Sun, 17 Sep 2000 17:42:30 +0300,
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2917T224252+0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
Does anyone else see my pgp signature was bad?
Yes.
hmm, then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
AM's Final Report for Chris Rutter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 10:42:52PM +0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
Your PGP signature was bad.
I try mutt now, and it also shows good.
Does anyone else see my pgp signature was bad?
yes.. under mutt even.
gpg: Signature made Fri Sep 15 14:45:25 2000 CDT using RSA key ID 7E2218E5
gpg: BAD
Hi. This mail is just sent to the list.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on Tue, 12 Sep 2000 15:22:12 +,
michael d. ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm glad I can help. When philh first asked me which areas I wanted to
help in, during the NM process, I suggested NM, just because I knew it
was so
Hi.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on Thu, 14 Sep 2000 11:44:54 +0100,
Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was mentioned in a private email that there is, as yet, no AM
HOWTO. I have just concocted a mini-HOWTO, which is attached. Any
comments or improvements would be accepted. Maybe this
Hi.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on Sat, 16 Sep 2000 21:32:08 +0100,
Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please could we do something about this?
- Forwarded message from Michael Moerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
I didn't know any Debian developers personally before I applied either,
but
Hi,
I'm processing my first NM and I'm in identification process. He is Tom
Cato Amundsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]. He has a gpg key signed by Per
Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED], but Per signed Tom's key with his new gpg
key, and this key is not in keyring yet. I could only get that key from
another
On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 11:01:46PM +0900, Taketoshi Sano wrote:
It was mentioned in a private email that there is, as yet, no AM
HOWTO. I have just concocted a mini-HOWTO, which is attached. Any
comments or improvements would be accepted. Maybe this can go onto
the AM part of the NM
On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 09:36:41PM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote:
Hi,
I'm processing my first NM and I'm in identification process. He is Tom
Cato Amundsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]. He has a gpg key signed by Per
Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED], but Per signed Tom's key with his new gpg
key, and this key
Howdy,
I found in db.debian.org...
ub 1024D/89B2B733 2000-06-19 Per Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key fingerprint = 67FE A7C9 C8A9 9BDF B8DF 6224 973C 47BE 89B2 B733
sig89B2B733 2000-06-19 Per Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sig90CB3189 2000-06-19 Per Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 02:13:32PM -0700, Shane Wegner wrote:
I think it would then depend on whether you can obtain a
trust path from that GPG key to Mr. Lundberg himself. If
it for example is signed by his old key which is in the
keyring or if it is signed by another developer, you can
14 matches
Mail list logo
