Mundial 2002

2002-05-13 Thread sem_resposta
http://www.lojadotelemovel.com/images/riscado_cinza.gif";> http://www.lojadotelemovel.com/mailing/images/logo.jpg"; width="580" height="49"> http://www.lojadotelemovel.com/mailing/images/topo.jpg"; width="580" height="93">

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices"

2002-05-13 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 10:42:02AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes: > Anthony> There is _absolutely_ no call for other packaging tools, and > Anthony> absolutely _no_ need for a standard to make this easy or > Yeah, right. There is never any need for co

Re: Best Packaging Practices - collecting ideas (and texts!)

2002-05-13 Thread Roland Mas
Stefano Zacchiroli (2002-05-11 00:30:54 +0200) : > I suggests: > * Multiple configure-make cycles > > For reference have a look to a thread of some weeks ago on > debian-mentors with the same subject, the first message id of the thread > was <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; one example reported in this > thre

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices"

2002-05-13 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes: Anthony> Julian, please note the above: this is "who's talking about Anthony> dpkg anyway". This is getting no where fast. Anthony> There is _absolutely_ no call for other packaging tools, and Anthony> absolutely _no_ need for a standard to make

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices"

2002-05-13 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 01:45:33AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes: > >> *Sigh*. Let me see if I can dot the i's and cross the t's. A > >> package should be buildable using the bits mentioned in policy. Any > >> package may, however, choose to add any extra

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices"

2002-05-13 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 01:29:59AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes: > Anthony> The documentation should be found wherever the dpkg > Anthony> maintainers want it, not wherever the -policy maintainers > Anthony> think might be fun. > What policy contai

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices"

2002-05-13 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes: Anthony> On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 05:19:09PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> >>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes: Anthony> The real question is whether maintainers are meant to build Anthony> using the features of dpkg, or the ones listed in >> *Sigh*.

Re: Best Packaging Practices - collecting ideas (and texts!)

2002-05-13 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Bob" == Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bob> Most of the documentation emphasizes debhelper, but the Bob> possibility of writing a rules file by hand should be mentioned. Bob> Any description of hand-crafted rules files should mention the Bob> sample rules files availa

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices"

2002-05-13 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes: Anthony> The documentation should be found wherever the dpkg Anthony> maintainers want it, not wherever the -policy maintainers Anthony> think might be fun. What policy contains won't be documentation. It shall be a standard interface that must be