Kit de marketing mais completo do mercado!!

2002-11-03 Thread Alessandra - Fastmarketing
Title: FastMarketing FRETE GRÁTIS (SEDEX) PARA TODO O BRASIL! O KIT de mala-direta digital mais COMPLETO do mercado, APENAS: R$ 89,00 Não perca tempo! Peça já o seu aqu

Re: Microsoft's plans to kill open source: TCPA

2002-11-03 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 12:19:44PM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: > FUD! FUD FUD FUD FUD!!! This is completely all wrong. Recently a talk > was given at MIT by one of the designers of Microsoft Palladium (their > trusted computing initiative) at MIT. I was at the talk, which received > lots of

Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me

2002-11-03 Thread Branden Robinson
[Since Ian has said he won't listen to me, I'm making these remarks for the benefit of the rest of the Project.] On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 05:19:02PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > 5. Offer advice. > > The Technical Committee may make formal announcements about its > views on any matter. ((I

Download

2002-11-03 Thread Ger
Which is the link to download the spanish pack of instalation of Debian? Thanks, Germán Kijel from Argentina

Re: TCPA

2002-11-03 Thread Raul Miller
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 12:19:44PM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: > The only negative thing I see comming out of TCPA is that content > producers (Hollywood, etc) will release copies of their > movies/music/whatever for download in a format that can only be accessed > on TCPA systems. This is the

Re: Microsoft's plans to kill open source: TCPA

2002-11-03 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
[ I've pruned the giant list of innappropriate and off-topic CCs ] On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 11:57:51PM +0100, Hauke Goos-Habermann wrote: > Microsoft plans to kill all OpenSource software on hardware level. This > technology is called TCPA. FUD! FUD FUD FUD FUD!!! This is completely all wrong. R

Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me

2002-11-03 Thread Ian Jackson
Manoj Srivastava writes ("Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me"): > Incidentally, my concerns have not been addressed, as > dismissed, in typical high handed fashion: for example: > a) I objected to the supercilious language used in the document; >