On Wed, 06 Nov 2002 23:01:14 -0600,
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do we envisage this document being used? When shall people
refer to it?
when someone files an ITP, or someone comments on an ITP
What kinds of conflicts can be thus resolved?
don't bloat the Debian archive
Robert Lemmen wrote:
sorry for crossposting this to debian-project but a quick look at the
archive showed that the signal/noise ratio in debian-publicity, where
this mail should go to, is 0. sad btw.
The list is no more, so debian-project@lists.debian.org is the proper
place.
Regards,
Robert Lemmen wrote:
i am currently working in vietnam, and me and some people here want to
start a bit of a linux advocacy campaign because open software is really
not very popular here.
Great! Please go ahead!
it would be two parts actually, one series of linux flyers targeted at
anyone
Manoj Srivastava writes (A different approach to a conflict resolution
document):
Well, given that I have deep philosophical differences with
the document Ian is crafting, and acknowledging that one ought to
have an alternative, I have decided to start an collaborative effort
to
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 05:17:55PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Duncan Findlay writes (Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4):
Other considerations, many of these are taken from Branden Robinson,
whose e-mails you don't seem to read anymore:
...
2) You need to explain what you
5 matches
Mail list logo
