On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In conclusion the person who wrote the review seemed like a smart
> fellow, maybe a little too smart, and should perhaps apply some of that
> intelligence towards considering how phenomenally popular debian has
> become, and why, before taking too stro
I hope I'm not speaking out of place, I'm a long time user first time poster,
recent subscriber. Id like to point out that there's a very good reason Linux
and debian are so popular. For many people, there is no choice. Unix is and has
been the industrial standard for a long long time. Debian as th
> > The fact that no version of Debian has a complete edition of KDE 3.x
> > doesn't make the argument that more people should use it any easier.
>
> Well, unstable does.
Actually, right now several critical pieces of KDE are missing from
unstable:
kdenetwork
kmail
kdepim
I've known at least one
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 11:40:08AM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> > While I can appreciate using limited resources to their fullest potential,
> > my
> > main issue with the no updates to Woody policy would have to do with
> > OpenOffice. IMHO OpenOffice is as significant to Linux on the desktop a
4 matches
Mail list logo
