Re: comment on "User Review of Debian GNU/Linux"

2003-03-06 Thread Adam DiCarlo
Alexander Antoniades <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Well, I don't know where that statement came from. What became woody > > was certainly the least buggy, most secure set of software we had at > > the time when woody froze. Which was a long long time before release. > > Well in my opinion the

Re: comment on "User Review of Debian GNU/Linux"

2003-03-06 Thread Dale E Martin
> don't know what your luck is like, but the Debian mirrors I've tried > (wustl.edu and rutguers.edu) are overloaded about half the time I access > them. "apt-get install netselect" and then run this command: netselect -vvv $(host http.us.debian.org | cut -f3) It will tell you which official mi

Re: comment on "User Review of Debian GNU/Linux"

2003-03-06 Thread Alexander Antoniades
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 12:40 pm, Adam DiCarlo wrote: > Which materials, at least of the ones on www.debian.org, are you > referring to? Have you filed bugs for them or sumbitted feedback on > them? Well as far as conflicting I haven't found any on Debian.org, more outdated documents like Dwarf