Folgende Daten wurden uebermittelt von
()
am Montag, 7. April 2003 um 06:24:21
---
betreff: Eine neue SMS für Dich von Susann http://nowme.redirectme.net an new
SMS for You!
nachricht: http://nowme.redirectme.net
---
On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 03:36:24PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> point of view, bible-kjv-text is in there because it's useful
> reference material. I would support packaging, e.g., the
It's also data for the bible-kjv package.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream -
On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 05:07:47AM -0700, David Nusinow wrote:
> Are the ideas in these packages xenophobic?
Heh, if we were going to reject packages with xenophobic ideas, we'd
lose most of the games. xgalaga, anyone?
Richard Braakman
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 11:01:45PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I don't understand why the packages anarchism, bible-kjv and
> bible-kjv-text (in section doc) are Debian packages. They are no
> technical documentation, they don't correspond (in my eyes) to open
> source's philosophy, they can
On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 10:17:15AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Because somebody packaged them.
>
> Do you accept any package? Fortunately not! You don't accept any for
> technical reasons (for example, in the Debian Weekly News issued February
> 18th, 2003, it was considered to remove a
> I don't understand why the packages anarchism, bible-kjv and
> bible-kjv-text (in section doc) are Debian packages. They are no
> technical documentation, they don't correspond (in my eyes) to open
> source's philosophy, they can be easily found on the WWW...
Because someone packaged them, and s
Hello,
> All the dictionary packages are not technical documentation and
> don't correspond to open source philosophy. And all the linux
> gazette packages, there are others too...
Apart from the three packages I've quoted before, all the doc packages are
technical ones or correspond to open sou
7 matches
Mail list logo
