On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 08:53:31AM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote:
A big part of the spam can be trivially blocked at the point where it enters
the Debian servers, using DNSRBLs and other sensible restrictions. When it
enters my mailer, it can not be trivially blocked as
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 08:53:31AM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von
Bidder wrote:
A big part of the spam can be trivially blocked at the point where it
enters
the Debian servers, using DNSRBLs and other sensible restrictions. When it
enters my mailer, it
On Thursday 01 May 2003 15:36, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 08:53:31AM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von
Bidder wrote:
A big part of the spam can be trivially blocked at the point where it
enters the Debian servers, using DNSRBLs and other sensible restrictions.
When it
I want, with this mail, to start a campaign on improving Debian
reliability.
Policy on improving stable release are, in my humble opinion, too
restrictive and don't give the opportunity to improve Debian quality out
of security fix. I think that as release cycle is very long we have to
accept
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A lot of legitimate mail can be trivially blocked this way, as well, which
is why it doesn't make sense to drop it on the server side.
No. Using SBL definitely does not block a lot of legitimate mail.
--
ciao,
Marco
On Wednesday 30 April 2003 22:50, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 08:50:43PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
What's wrong with our mail system? Why can't the debian admins blacklist
a well known spammer, or even better use a reputable DNSBL like SBL?
I asked the same questions to
6 matches
Mail list logo
