Re: Skolelinux and the Debian Labs idea

2003-10-10 Thread Anthony Towns
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 04:58:22PM +, Dylan Thurston wrote: On 2003-10-09, Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote: non-free on such machines? Unpackaged stuff? Stuff packaged locally? LSB stuff? Proprietary stuff like win4lin or CrossoverOffice? non-free/proprietary stuff, better

Re: Bug#210879: marked as done (constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers)

2003-10-10 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 07:18:15PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: The other reason to close this report is that the doc debian package can't itself do anything to fix this supposed flaw; it has no authority to modify the constitution. If the constitution needs to be changed,

Bug#155998: ENDEAVOUR TO USE IT FOR THE CHILDREN OF GOD

2003-10-10 Thread megyhatch
From: Mrs Magret Hatch PLEASE ENDEAVOUR TO USE IT FOR THE CHILDREN OF GOD. I am the above named person from Kuwait. I am married to Mr. Kazeem Hatch who worked with Kuwait embassy in Ivory Coast for nine years before he died in the year 2001.We were married for eleven years without a child.

Re: Skolelinux and the Debian Labs idea

2003-10-10 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Anthony Towns wrote: .au law is that you can't make donations for work on Debian tax deductible. Why not? In Germany, the way this works is that an organization sets up a list of goals, and if these fall into some categories which define tax-exempt status, the state grants that status to

Bug#210879: Reopen: revise odd language in 'constitution.txt' -- K Developers ... not integers

2003-10-10 Thread Alfie Costa
reopen 210879 ! thanks M. Srivastava writes: If you do find anything substantive to add to the report, please do so. My follow-up message to Burrows, which should be just after (or maybe just before, some emails get mixed up in transit) the long rambling one, should fit the bill.

Processed: Reopen: revise odd language in 'constitution.txt' -- K Developers ... not integers

2003-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 210879 ! Bug#210879: constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers Bug reopened, originator set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#210879: Reopen: revise odd language in 'constitution.txt' -- K Developers ... not integers

2003-10-10 Thread MJ Ray
Stop this nonsense please. I think you should demonstrate consensus on -project that there is a problem, then open a bug report and seek help to fix it. However, your current reasoning is unconvincing. K is a calculated figure, not a measure. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly

Bug#210879: marked as done (constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers)

2003-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:45:24 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line There was nothing new in the reopen message has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: Reopen: revise odd language in 'constitution.txt' -- K Developers ... not integers

2003-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 210879 ! Bug#210879: constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers Bug reopened, originator set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking