On 2003-12-04 00:52:17 + Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FWIW, while I'm not sure if I agree with the assertion that it is a
problem, I do think the submitter deserves some level of
justification for
why it isn't left open/wontfix, since that is, in fact, what the
default
state for "
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003, Joel Baker wrote:
> FWIW, while I'm not sure if I agree with the assertion that it is a
> problem, I do think the submitter deserves some level of justification for
> why it isn't left open/wontfix,
Because there is no problem. We need at least
developers is perfectly clear
Hi There,
Happy Holiday.
We are going to use Nvidia FX5900 256MB AGP 8X, do we need a driver?
VGA card maker: MSI
Best regards!
John Shen
408-943-9193 X220
Fine Tec Company
780 Montague Expwy., Suite 206
San Jose, CA 95131
Fax: 408-943-9198
Cell: 408-499-9800
Looks to me like the only reasonable next step, since the user considers it
sufficiently important to ask for it to be open/wontfix (which might not be
unreasonable), and others insist that it be closed completely (which also
might not be unreasonable), is to ask... well, I'd guess the tech-ctty,
e
Your message dated Tue, 2 Dec 2003 20:04:56 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line pong
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
B
Your message dated Sun, 30 Nov 2003 14:04:22 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#210879: constitution.txt: revise odd language -- "K
Developers"... "not integers"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
reopen 210879 !
thanks
The story so far...
AC reported that certain language was ambiguous.
Many objections ensued**, the substance of which can be divided in two types.
The first kind was from non-native English speakers who honestly didn't see any
ambiguity. The second kind was from mat
reopen 210879 !
thanks
On 30 Nov 2003, at 14:04, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Hello.
Hello.
> The objections are because there isn't a problem here. Everyone knows how
> it's to be interpreted,
I like your tagline. Have you ever read your own tagline?
AT's Tagline:> I don't speak for anyone s
8 matches
Mail list logo
