Re: Bug#219545: Proposed packages to remove from testing

On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 10:01:17AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > See previous complaints. Debian clearly has some serious problems; I > personally credited some of them to James Troup once. The surprising part > about that was that I was then told by several other people, "Well, you've > preve

Re: New FTP-master needed, or other fix.

Scott James Remnant wrote: >Can you provide a recent example? I've not seen any of this nature >since the ftpmasters added to their numbers. I'm not an ftpmaster btw, >I've just not seen any recent complaints of this nature recently. In fact, I can't think of an example in the last 2 months offh

Re: Bug#219545: Proposed packages to remove from testing

(Moving from debian-release -- followups probably belong in debian-project) Steve Langasek (http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2003/debian-release-200312/msg00010.html): > "Not buildable" -> "not releasable." This is not a new concept. Steve Langasek (http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/

Re: About new release

Jean Christophe ANDRÉ wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Le lundi 15 décembre 2003 à 16h19 (+0100), Martin Schulze écrivait : > > > The last stable release is 3.0r2, as announced here: > > > http://www.debian.org/News/2003/20031121a > > No. The last stable release is Debian GNU/Linux 3.0, which wa

Re: About new release

Hi everybody, Le lundi 15 décembre 2003 à 16h19 (+0100), Martin Schulze écrivait : > > The last stable release is 3.0r2, as announced here: > > http://www.debian.org/News/2003/20031121a > No. The last stable release is Debian GNU/Linux 3.0, which was > released on July 19th, 2002. http