Hi,
I do not want to try to decide whether the FSF oder the OSI consider such
licenses as free or non-free. I also do not know whether such Clauses are
covered by the DFSG. I just want to list a few Reasons why I consider such
licenses as strictly non-free and would prefer Debian to consider the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Such a clause excludes certain (or more likely undefinded) person
subgroups from the rights all other user get for this software. Not per
default, but after a certain action of the user, but the software
restricts its use to certain person subgroups.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 10:05:29AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
The GPL does much the same. If someone distributes GPLed software
without complying with section 3 (which gives you various ways in which
you have to make source code available to the recipient), then they lose
the right to use
Hi John!
El vie, 17-09-2004 a las 21:51, John Richard Moser escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
| Hi John,
|
| El vie, 17-09-2004 a las 19:04, John Richard Moser escribió:
|
|-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|Hash: SHA1
I've authorized and asked ffis e.V. (the keeper of Debian money in
Europe) to donate 1,000 EUR to the Foundation for a Free Information
Infrastructure (FFII). FFII supports the development of public
information goods based on copyright, free competition, and open
standards. Some of their current
Hi John,
El sáb, 18-09-2004 a las 00:20, John Richard Moser escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
[...]
Good, at least you understand that :)
|
|Yes and then the program halts and gets SIGABRT. Do you not know what a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
[...]
Good, at least you understand that :)
|
|Yes and then the program halts and gets SIGABRT. Do you not know what a
|DoS attack is?
|
|[...]
|
|
| Duty of Shame ?
| OK, leaving the Fun Mode off...
|
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 10:05:29AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
The GPL does much the same. If someone distributes GPLed software
without complying with section 3 (which gives you various ways in which
you have to make source code available to the
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 10:55:33PM +0200, Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
Yes.The `apt-get install hardened? was an example of something 100% easy
to use :D
Unfortunately whilst easy to use is good the idea of rebuilding the
packages presented so far isn't going to be easy to setup.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
| Hi,
|
[...]
| Debian Hardened is like Debian Junior, and the rest of subprojects.
| *We* must provide the best (and the easiest) way to harden Debian for
| advanced users, sysadmins or just people that
Matthew Garrett wrote:
Recently, we've begun seeing more licenses that are designed to
discourage patent lawsuits. They usually involve something along the
lines of If you engage in patent action against the licensor, bad
things will happen.
Patent action against the licensor usually takes
Hi John,
El vie, 17-09-2004 a las 19:04, John Richard Moser escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
| Hi,
|
[...]
| Debian Hardened is like Debian Junior, and the rest of subprojects.
| *We* must provide the best (and the
12 matches
Mail list logo
