Hello
I got the feeling that starting a discussion Cc'd to debian-admin
is senseless as they seem too busy to answer.
(See current mega-threads in debian-private that could have easily
ended by a single definite statement by the admins)
I therefore propose to create a pseudo bug packages for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23-09-2004 22:58, Richard A. Hecker wrote:
| On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 02:55:41AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
|
|On 23-09-2004 19:30, Richard A. Hecker wrote:
|
|
| ...snip...
|
|| It is wrong for a person to equate d-private == secret_content.
|
On 2004-09-24 07:43:58 +0100 Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I therefore propose to create a pseudo bug packages for mail issues
(and/or
maybe one for general admin topics) like the existing
lists.debian.org or
www.debian.org.
Probably a good first step. I would suggest admin
Hello
On 2004-09-24 MJ Ray wrote:
On 2004-09-24 07:43:58 +0100 Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I therefore propose to create a pseudo bug packages for mail issues
(and/or maybe one for general admin topics) like the existing
lists.debian.org or www.debian.org.
Probably a
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 08:17:27AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 12:25:21PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
And again, I don't believe the freedom to prosecute with patent
accusations is an important freedom to protect, any more than
freedom to take my software
Andrew Suffield writes:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 08:17:27AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 12:25:21PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
And again, I don't believe the freedom to prosecute with patent
accusations is an important freedom to protect, any more than
On 2004-09-24 13:37:42 +0100 Michael Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Computer programs, by their nature, combine both copyrightable and
patentable elements.
Mathematical relationships are discoveries, not inventions. Similarly
algorithms: the right one existed, but you just didn't know it.
MJ Ray writes:
On 2004-09-24 13:37:42 +0100 Michael Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Computer programs, by their nature, combine both copyrightable and
patentable elements.
Mathematical relationships are discoveries, not inventions. Similarly
algorithms: the right one existed, but you
On 2004-09-24 14:23:34 +0100 Michael Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your (claimed) law is not everyone's law. It's silly to ignore the
case of the US [...]
Similarly, it's silly to assert that US law is everyone's law and that
computer programs are naturally patentable. It's silly that US
* Matthew Garrett:
Debian is not a document prepared by the Secretariat of the Council of
Europe. As a result, it is not bound by this resolution.
Following others in the area of geographical names helps to avoid
conflicts. It's not Debian's task to take side in such international
disputes.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 11:06:30AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 23-09-2004 22:58, Richard A. Hecker wrote:
|
| I see this secrecy-lock as a byproduct of d-private and not the main
| goal. As you acknowledge above, laziness is the issue. Your solution
| requires lazy people to jump
On 2004-09-24 15:49:12 +0100 Michael Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] patents covering programs is not a problem
specific to the USA. [...]
Indeed, but that's neither global nor natural. The post I first
replied to seemed to be claiming it was natural that programs are
patentable.
You
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 16:41 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Matthew Garrett:
Debian is not a document prepared by the Secretariat of the Council of
Europe. As a result, it is not bound by this resolution.
Following others in the area of geographical names helps to avoid
conflicts. It's
On 2004-09-24 15:41:54 +0100 Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following others in the area of geographical names helps to avoid
conflicts. It's not Debian's task to take side in such international
disputes.
Should we follow the Republic of Macedonia, the EU foreign ministers,
ISO or
On Friday 24 September 2004 10:38 am, MJ Ray wrote:
Similarly, it's silly to assert that US law is everyone's law and that
computer programs are naturally patentable.
I think it should be pretty clear by now that what is naturally patentable
is anything that someone making lots of money
MJ Ray writes:
On 2004-09-24 15:49:12 +0100 Michael Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] patents covering programs is not a problem
specific to the USA. [...]
Indeed, but that's neither global nor natural. The post I first
replied to seemed to be claiming it was natural that programs
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Christian Hammers wrote:
Hello
I got the feeling that starting a discussion Cc'd to debian-admin
is senseless as they seem too busy to answer.
(See current mega-threads in debian-private that could have easily
ended by a single definite statement by the admins)
I
Hello
Bshaina, alaha amukh
Title: Curso Interativo HP12C - Função da Máquina GRATIS
Wilson Magno Vidal
Engineering Assistant
Eaton Fluid Power
Av. Julia Gaiolli, 450
Zip Code: 07250-270
Bonsucesso - Guarulhos - SP - Brazil
Phone: 55 (11) 6465-8779
Fax: 55 (11) 6465-8712
Cell: 55 (11) 9862-9473
E-mail:
On 2004-09-24 18:06:47 +0100 Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Get those who would supposedly benefit from this to agree. However,
if they
prefer the current way of doing things, you can't force it down their
throat.
How? Emails to admin addresses seem to go unanswered and we can't even
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 04:21:57PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
On 2004-09-24 15:41:54 +0100 Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following others in the area of geographical names helps to avoid
conflicts. It's not Debian's task to take side in such international
disputes.
Should we follow
On 2004-09-24 17:03:17 +0100 Michael Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] When I said that
computer programs include patentable elements in my earlier mail I
meant simply that people can and have received patents that cover the
operation of certain computer programs.
Thank you for the
Hi all,
Steve Langasek wrote :
I don't see a reason for Debian to use any name at all for the Greek
province of Macedonia. From Debian's standpoint, there is no namespace
collision here; Debian's locale system generally only needs to know
about top-level, autonomous territories.
Steve,
I
MJ Ray writes:
However, do we agree that a free copyright licence may not terminate
when someone asserts a copyright claim?
Suppose Alice publishes Asoft under the GPL. Bob files a lawsuit
claiming that Asoft infringes his copyright on his proprietary program
Bsoft. Does that breach section
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 10:46:12AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
On 2004-09-24 07:43:58 +0100 Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I therefore propose to create a pseudo bug packages for mail issues
(and/or maybe one for general admin topics) like the existing
lists.debian.org or www.debian.org.
On 2004-09-24 12:05:57 +0100 Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so I thought that the project meta package is also more for
organisatorical
problems or things that concerns the project leader and not for
specific
problems with some mail server configuration...
The pseudo-package is
MJ Ray writes:
On 2004-09-24 14:23:34 +0100 Michael Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your (claimed) law is not everyone's law. It's silly to ignore the
case of the US [...]
Similarly, it's silly to assert that US law is everyone's law and that
computer programs are naturally patentable.
27 matches
Mail list logo
