On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 01:09:19PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:35:51PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 06:19:32PM +0100, Pete van der Spoel wrote:
Or is the whole Ubuntu thing (where I understand Mark Shuttleworth has
hired
a large
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:15:00PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 01:09:19PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:35:51PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 06:19:32PM +0100, Pete van der Spoel wrote:
Or is the whole Ubuntu
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:15:00PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 01:09:19PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Fortunately, that is not the case with Canonical.
Yes it is. Fork and forget is Canonical's modus operandi (despite all
the PR claiming otherwise).
Being in a
-Original Message-
From: Manoj Srivastava
To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Sent: 12/1/04 8:41 PM
Subject: Re: Mail forwarding in return for Debian donation
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 18:19:32 +0100, Pete van der Spoel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
We don't have any use for money right now. What
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:28:19PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:15:00PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 01:09:19PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Fortunately, that is not the case with Canonical.
Yes it is. Fork and forget is Canonical's
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 08:23:44AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:15:00PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 01:09:19PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:35:51PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:22:57PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
Being in a position of judging the facts without preconceptions, I can
point to plenty more that aren't.
The fact that not _everything_ has been submitted yet still doesn't support
your (exaggerated) argument. That figure will
Pete van der Spoel wrote:
What about having a small financial reward for each release critical bug
that is squashed?
Just to heat up the discussion a bit: Why should $some_developer get
a reward for popping up just before a release while other work on the
distribution continuesly with large
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 18:19:32 +0100, Pete van der Spoel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
We don't have any use for money right now. What we have mostly just
sits in a bank account getting slowly devalued by inflation. So
fund raising exercises aren't really a good idea.
Oh. Okay at least I don't
9 matches
Mail list logo
