-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15-12-2004 01:22, Art McGee wrote:
What distinguishes Capitalism from mere Sustainability
are the concepts of Capital Accumulation, Incessant
Growth, and Labor Exploitation.
Take your political propaganda elsewhere.
Maybe I missed
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:49:20 -0600, John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Stephen Frost writes:
Interesting question, I imagine it would have to be SPI on behalf
of Debian.
But which specific individual would do the selling? It would
involve a significant amount of work even if as much as
On 2004-12-15 15:14:51 + Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hmm. How hard is it to introduce bugs that one would
subsequently get paid to fix?
Not very hard. It's a situation described in the book The Dilbert
Principle by Scott Adams.
Now, when will DDs be issued with
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:27:15 -0500, Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Perhaps not, as I said, I thought it'd be an interesting discussion,
not that we should go out and market it as a new Debian thing to do.
I don't mind valid critiques of why something isn't workable, I do
mind
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Right. Money, in the form of donations, is nothing
new. Money-for-work or money-for-advertizing is. There is a
difference; the former is generouisly donated by people voluntarily
because of the good they thing debian is doing; the latter
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:33:14 -0500, Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
* Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Well, sure, but it's something intelligent to do w/ a consistent
revenue stream that would benefit us through SPI (at least,
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:12:19 -0500, Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:27:15 -0500, Stephen Frost
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Perhaps not, as I said, I thought it'd be an interesting
discussion, not that we should go out
Hi all!
At first it was a good idear to post this question here but since
yesterday nothing much productive has happened.
Without offending anyone it is a bit annoying to watch the same couple
of people going on and on about this issue - leading to nowhere
(according to my opinion).
If
* Kim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
At first it was a good idear to post this question here but since
yesterday nothing much productive has happened.
Without offending anyone it is a bit annoying to watch the same couple
of people going on and on about this issue - leading to nowhere
* Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] [041214 22:22]:
Erm, we could always remove the google ads from the site if there was a
problem.
Well... I think my posting had an other point, but I can't remeber
which. Sorry.
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
SPI *is* a business...
SPI is a corporation. That does not make it a business (just attend a few
board meettings...)
--
John Hasler
* John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
SPI *is* a business...
SPI is a corporation. That does not make it a business (just attend a few
board meettings...)
I've been to a few of them, and am an SPI member... corporation,
business, shrug
Stephen
signature.asc
Description:
Stephen Frost wrote:
* Kim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
At first it was a good idear to post this question here but since
yesterday nothing much productive has happened.
Without offending anyone it is a bit annoying to watch the same couple
of people going on and on about this issue - leading
* Kim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:
Then I guess let me just say some of us aren't quite done yet. :)
And thats cool, but it seems to me that the discussion has left the
original area and has become a one on one discussion about something
which really is a matter of
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 04:33:14PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
Sure, you could spend money on any of these things. But you can't
*justify* spending money on them, because we don't need it.
And I disagree, and these are only a few things upon which we could
spend money, if we weren't so
* Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] [041215 10:06]:
The decision should be taken by the answers on two questions:
1. Does it go with our principles?
2. Does it add a benefit for our users?
3. Does it add a benefit for our developers / project?
Just a special case of item 2. What's
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:25:40 -0500, Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:33:14 -0500, Stephen Frost
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
* Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Well, sure, but it's something intelligent to do
* Stephen Frost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:25:40 -0500, Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Simple, the DPL selects them. We elected him, and that indicates
that we trust his decisions on such matters as how to spend
Stephen Frost writes:
The fact that Debian doesn't 'exist'...
Organizations do not need to be incorporated to have legal existence.
--
John Hasler
19 matches
Mail list logo
