[English version below]
Cher(e) internaute,
Ceci est une réponse automatique à votre mail au webmaster de Club-Internet.
Cette adresse est désactivée, votre mail ne sera donc pas lu.
Afin de satisfaire votre demande, merci de bien vouloir utiliser le formulaire
Nous contacter qui est
Stephen Frost wrote:
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:25:40 -0500, Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Simple, the DPL selects them. We elected him, and that indicates
that we trust his decisions on such matters as how to spend Debian
funds in
* Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:25:40 -0500, Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Simple, the DPL selects them. We elected him, and that indicates
that we trust his decisions
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 08:38:04PM -0400, Jolanta Piorko wrote:
What the fuck is going on; is it your url? - http://www.counterpunch.org/ if
not get the fuck out of there
I believe you're mistaken.
Debian[1] is an international organization of volunteers who have made
common cause to produce a
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 08:59:55PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
Stephen Frost writes:
The fact that Debian doesn't 'exist'...
Organizations do not need to be incorporated to have legal existence.
You can't sue it and it can't hold assets. It's just a group of
individuals.
--
.''`. **
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 09:33:22PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
I don't think we're talking about lottery-winning here. In my head
we're not talking about money going to developers either, initially. I
guess my vision is something like:
Develop a dependable revenue stream unless current
* Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 09:33:22PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
It's a thought anyway. Those involved with SPI have probably had some
thoughts along these lines before, I imagine.
You're thinking about founding a corporation. There are plenty of
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 01:26:19PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 09:33:22PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
It's a thought anyway. Those involved with SPI have probably had some
thoughts along these lines before, I imagine.
* Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 01:26:19PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
SPI already exists, and already owns Debian's trademarks.
It holds them in trust. That is not the same thing.
Right, that means it holds them but can't do anything unless directed by
I'll let the transcript speak for itself:
... foobarbaz is now known as pipeline
... pipeline was kicked off #debian by nagual (no status nicks, last warning)
loststryk hey all :) i am pretty new to debian, and would appreciate
anyoens help on sorting out a screen resolution problem i have, i
also sprach Francis Crick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.12.16.2344 +0100]:
bottom line: nagual shouldn't be an op in #debian
i agree. sorry for the inconvenience.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :proud Debian
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Francis Crick wrote:
I'll let the transcript speak for itself:
... foobarbaz is now known as pipeline
... pipeline was kicked off #debian by nagual (no status nicks, last warning)
Which #debian (ie, on what network) is this, anyway?
[Since this nagual person isn't on FN
On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 15:42, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Francis Crick wrote:
I'll let the transcript speak for itself:
... foobarbaz is now known as pipeline
... pipeline was kicked off #debian by nagual (no status nicks, last
warning)
Which #debian (ie, on what
13 matches
Mail list logo
