On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 01:23:31AM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Someone suggested me to post here :-) (I am not subscribed)
If you want to be CC'd on replies, please set your MFT header.
> I am sure some people have concern. If so, can we start establishing
> publically agreeed guideline for the l
In the following post, I cover the following issues:
1) General problems with the proposal with regards to the Social
Contract.
2) An interpretation of the parts of the Social Contract I think are
relevant.
3) Example ill effects of the proposal on the Debian Project.
4) Some technical problems wit
Hi,
Someone suggested me to post here :-) (I am not subscribed)
Here is my rewote message with a bit more thought:
We all know we waste too much time on ML discussing and reading many
postings. We must have some rule for ML to improve this situation.
I think limiting a number of post per user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24-12-2004 23:44, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
[bla bla comment on an earlier post, and then...:]
> Anyway, this discussion should be on -project.
Please post your point at the proper list - noone will do it for you.
Responding and then complaining sol
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 10:19:33PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project
Leader wrote:
> * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-12 02:46]:
> > IMO it would have helped if a Debian license arbitration body had been
> > formally delegated by the DPL, but as we all know, that didn't happe
5 matches
Mail list logo
