On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 08:53:07AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:03:49PM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 08:05:57PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
Because this is *exactly* the situation you get with invariant sections.
Sure, you can add another
This site showed up on my AOL account, and was unauthorized as my homepage.
Please instruct me on how to remove this homepage.
Peter Vandenabeele writes:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 05:31:31AM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 10:56:57AM +0100, Peter Vandenabeele wrote:
An interesting consequence of this proposal is that a Copy-Exact of
the GPL License could not longer go into main (as it is
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 08:53:45AM -0500, Michael Poole wrote:
Peter Vandenabeele writes:
I did not understand why a document with invariant sections cannot
be part of Free/main (in the Debian context) and the GPL license
which states that it only allows verbatim copies can be.
An
Peter Vandenabeele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did not understand why a document with invariant sections cannot
be part of Free/main (in the Debian context) and the GPL license
which states that it only allows verbatim copies can be.
What do you think the GPL only allows verbatim copies of?
I
Hi MTAntho!
You wrote:
This site showed up on my AOL account, and was unauthorized as my homepage.
Please instruct me on how to remove this homepage.
You might try actually reading what the page says. It's a placeholder
page, put there by your provider. Debian has nothing to do with it
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 05:31:31AM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 10:56:57AM +0100, Peter Vandenabeele wrote:
The way it is presented here, makes perfect sense to me. The author must
have the right to keep certain background/political/philosophical parts
of
his text
7 matches
Mail list logo
