On Saturday 12 February 2005 14:28, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> You missed the point. I'm asking for the rationale about the need
> for more and more key signatures.
The OP stated, that the second signature was needed to protect against a DD
"faking" a second one.
Regards, David
also sprach Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.12.1836 +0100]:
> All of this is very questionable, IMHO. I can't make mistakes that
> easily. At least, people notice mistakes very quickly.
Sure. But if your mistake is to let J. Random Hacker take over
your key without you taking note, it c
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.12.1426 +0100]:
>> Why wouldn't they get a _Debian membership_ status like any other
>> contributor? Isn't it unfair not to do so?
>
> Every additional member with write access to the archive is an
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 03:02:33PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.12.1426 +0100]:
> > Why wouldn't they get a _Debian membership_ status like any other
> > contributor? Isn't it unfair not to do so?
>
> Every additional member with write acce
also sprach Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.12.1426 +0100]:
> Why wouldn't they get a _Debian membership_ status like any other
> contributor? Isn't it unfair not to do so?
Every additional member with write access to the archive is an
additional threat to the integrity of the archive i
* Bruno Barrera C. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050212 14:25]:
> On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 13:55 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Do you realy think it is difficult to get a second signature onto your
> > gpg key? Go to one key-signing party and you get 10 even on a small
> > one.
> >
> > It might be di
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I don't get it. Do you have a concrete example that makes this necessary?
>> It seems more and more difficult to become member of Debian, which is
>> after all a volonteer-only project. Why trying to more and more discourage
>> people to contribu
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.12.1320 +0100]:
>> What about translators? Isn't it time to give them a real status?
>> They definitely aren't second-class contributors.
>
> They do not need developer status, do they? They should
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What about translators? Isn't it time to give them a real status?
>> They definitely aren't second-class contributors.
>
> Looking at Frans, this seems to work. My experience (also as AM) is that
> people who join Debian with another core task than main
On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 13:55 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> Do you realy think it is difficult to get a second signature onto your
> gpg key? Go to one key-signing party and you get 10 even on a small
> one.
>
> It might be difficult to get a DD signature for geographical reasons
> but any
On Saturday 12 February 2005 13:55, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> =?iso-8859-15?q?J=E9r=F4me_Marant?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> - Also not accepted are people without traceable actions for
> >> Debian. Examples of this include
> >>- having only one package in the archive, with only one
[for non-italian readers he's wondering why xfce-common disappeared (?)]
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 10:24:52PM +0100, Davide wrote:
> Ma dove è finito il pacchetto xfce-common?
questa e' una lista in inglese, prova su debian-user-italian o debian-italian
filippo
--
Filippo Giunchedi
GNU/PG key: 6B
=?iso-8859-15?q?J=E9r=F4me_Marant?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> - We wont accept[5] applicants who have only one signature on their GPG-key
>> if that signature is made by the advocate. If it has only a signature
>> from the advocate at least another one from the web-of-trust is
>> needed
also sprach Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.12.1320 +0100]:
> What about translators? Isn't it time to give them a real status?
> They definitely aren't second-class contributors.
They do not need developer status, do they? They should not upload
directly anyway, but go through the main
* Jérôme Marant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050212 13:25]:
> Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > - Also not accepted are people without traceable actions for
> > Debian. Examples of this include
> >- having only one package in the archive, with only one upload,
> >- packages with dead
(CC'ing -project as well)
Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
Hi,
Here are few comments/questions.
> following the various "Bits from $foo" this is a small mail to summarize
> whats up with "the DAMs".
[...]
> 1. Introduction of the new DAM member
> -
16 matches
Mail list logo
