Hi All,
Having just run the 2005 DPL IRC debate (and a stressful experience it
was too), Martin Krafft and I would like to get feedback on what people
thought of the debate and how it was run.
Suggestions for future debates will be very welcome, not that I am
planning to volunteer to do that again
Helen, Martin - thanks for your effort.
I found the first hour basically wasted time - the strength of IRC is that
it's real-time, while the form of the first hour of debate did not really
use that, instead showing the weaknesses of IRC when text needs to be
copied pasted around :-) The
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 01:44:45PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
I found the first hour basically wasted time - the strength of IRC is that
it's real-time, while the form of the first hour of debate did not really
use that, instead showing the weaknesses of IRC when text needs to be
Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 01:44:45PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
I found the first hour basically wasted time - the strength of IRC is that
it's real-time, while the form of the first hour of debate did not really
use that, instead showing the
Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 01:44:45PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
[...]
I haven't looked at any earlier IRC DPL candidate debates, so I can't
compare if this was better or worse.
Earler debates may have been easier due to the lower number of
participants.
I strongly suspect
* Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-15 12:32]:
It has been asserted on several occasions over the last few years that
the security team is overworked and understaffed. This is a problem
that is hard for the average developer to help with, because someone
who spontaneously volunteers
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 02:28:25PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
I also liked the second part better. I could imagine a compromise in
the middle of both schemes, for something to replace the first part; I
don't know whether this is technically manageable, though. My
suggestion is that only one
* Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-15 14:12]:
The baseline is: you don't ask for participating, you just do it by
getting involded in the areas you are interested in.
What you say is basically true. However, many Asian countries are
very new to free software (open source) development
* Rapid Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-15 16:35]:
Cambodia is new to Open Source. I am very interesting in this and some
of my students want to be debian developer.
Can you tell me how can we start on this?
In addition to what the other people have already said, I intend to
write a message
* Daniel Ruoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-16 14:20]:
Now that Joey posted a patch to debbugs implementing the
dependencies between bugs, could we think in creating a virtual
s/virtual/pseudo/ A virtual package is something else.
package etch, and using it to formalize and track the goals for
* Daniel Ruoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-16 14:38]:
Also, we don't have any pseudo package for edge or release
management stuff yet, so someone has to request it (and before
requesting it think about how it will be used and what we really
need).
That's what I'm trying to do here. But
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:03:35PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Anyway, I'd personally like to see more discussion about how to use
this feature before actually going ahead and using it. There are the
obvious use scenarios of actually using it to track real bug
dependencies. I can also
Em Qua, 2005-03-16 às 15:03, Martin Michlmayr escreveu:
* Daniel Ruoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-16 14:38]:
Also, we don't have any pseudo package for edge or release
management stuff yet, so someone has to request it (and before
requesting it think about how it will be used and what we
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:48:33PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, David Nusinow wrote:
The problem with this is that adding a lot of features to the BTS
while it's in use for etch may not be the wisest move. The last
thing we need is having our bug system go down because
* Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-17 02:15]:
Also, we don't have any pseudo package for edge or release management
stuff yet,
Eeek, it's 'etch' :P
Doh, thanks. I see I made this typo several times (in other
postings too). I think I'll be able to get it right from now on.
Maybe I
15 matches
Mail list logo
