Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(-project added to the Cc:, non-debian related lists removed)
> No documentation for the C compiler (not even a documentation of the
> options) will be neither fun for the users of Debian nor for the Debian
> maintainers - but it's the future of Debian...
Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
Hi,
> Isn't a public mailing list (with public logs), but moderated to
> @debian.org posters, a possible solution to the current misuse of
> debian-private?
Why the hell spending one's precious time with such metaphysical
questions?
In any case, co
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 11:33:12PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>http://wiki.debian.net/?Debconf5Meeting20050404
>
>We had a monthly IRC meeting about Debconf5 and the minutes are in the
>above address. Sorry, no log this time (unless someone adds a URL to the
>minutes later).
I'll have a log of
http://wiki.debian.net/?Debconf5Meeting20050404
We had a monthly IRC meeting about Debconf5 and the minutes are in the
above address. Sorry, no log this time (unless someone adds a URL to the
minutes later).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 09:11:45PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op ma, 04-04-2005 te 19:16 +0100, schreef Cristian Barbarosie:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I am trying to implement a cgi script for mirroring a small part of a
> > large collection of files (the debian distribution). The idea is to
> I was recently thinking about the misuse of debian-private mailing list,
> and I saw that most of the bad-uses of -private were made with the
> intention of reaching all developers.
>
> Is this wrong? Yes, and no. The question is that debian-devel has too
> much traffic and it's difficult to fol
* Daniel Ruoso ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On the other side, d-d-a is a list which has a very low traffic, and
> certainly almost every developer see the posts in d-d-a, but... not
> every email that intends to reach all developers is appropriate to d-d-a
> since it's not allways an announce.
>
Hi,
I was recently thinking about the misuse of debian-private mailing list,
and I saw that most of the bad-uses of -private were made with the
intention of reaching all developers.
Is this wrong? Yes, and no. The question is that debian-devel has too
much traffic and it's difficult to follow all
* Jimmy Kaplowitz:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 10:46:25AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
>> I don't really know myself what the procedures are, but I'm CCing the
>> trademark list on this for their feedback.
>
> I am not a trademark lawyer or otherwise especially knowledgeable, but
> I'd imagine that a
Op ma, 04-04-2005 te 19:16 +0100, schreef Cristian Barbarosie:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I am trying to implement a cgi script for mirroring a small part of a
> large collection of files (the debian distribution). The idea is to
> mirror only those files which are requested, by downloading them "on th
Hi everybody,
I am trying to implement a cgi script for mirroring a small part of a
large collection of files (the debian distribution). The idea is to
mirror only those files which are requested, by downloading them "on the
fly" when the clients request them. Requests in the form "wget
http:/
On Monday 04 April 2005 01.28, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Adrian von Bidder
> In the near future, Linux in the enterprise (server and desktop) will be
> an important part of my $DAYJOB, and I hope that I can do at least part
> of my work as a DD there.
Well, it didn't work out that way - I'
12 matches
Mail list logo
