On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:42:30AM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 04:30:14PM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
I'd like to think Branden would fix his mail setup for leader@ (or
best get his ISP to remove his IP from the DUL or provide one which
isn't on that list) in order
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 05:03:15AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
I don't see him trying to fix anything. Rather, I see him not wasting
time on trying to fix brainlessly broken crap but instead just
ignoring it and carrying on.
It is fine for individual developers to act like antisocial
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:40:29PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Adam McKenna]
It is fine for individual developers to act like antisocial fuckwits.
Sure. Just carry on the way you are. :)
It is not acceptable for our DPL to behave that way (not when acting
in his role as DPL,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 10:46:34AM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
You missed:
I received an interview request from Andy Channelle of the UK
publication Linux Format, but unfortunately was unable to get my
response to him because he's `blocking my mail`_. A freelancer for
the `Gartner
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As DPL he is the public face of the project and should make extra effort to
contact people when doing so would benefit the project.
Sure, but many of these people don't put telephone numbers on
their emails. Some put a web address and then you can work out
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 10:31:28AM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
I originally sent this mail to:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i.e. Leader and Project SCUD
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:55:58PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As DPL he is the public face of the project and should make extra effort to
contact people when doing so would benefit the project.
Sure, but many of these people don't put telephone numbers on
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:44:21AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
I don't quite agree with Branden's page that it is entirely
the blocker's fault - there's some blame with his ISP, or maybe
his ISP's relations with abuse.net and friends.
I don't understand how you are inferring an assignment of blame
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 03:22:33PM -0500, Branden Robinson / Debian Project
Leader wrote:
Again, for those who are reading in a hurry:
As of 10 May 2005, when I find myself blacklisted when sending mail as
[EMAIL PROTECTED], I fall back to a host that is not blacklisted.
Great news.
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:44:21AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
I don't quite agree with Branden's page that it is entirely
the blocker's fault - there's some blame with his ISP, or maybe
his ISP's relations with abuse.net and friends.
I don't understand
10 matches
Mail list logo
