On Sat, August 13, 2005 5:24 am, Jaldhar H. Vyas said:
2005 or 2006? If the former its a little short notice isn't it? If the
latter, I'd love to be there but theres no way in hell I could rustle up a
ticket to Indian in one week.
2005.. sadly. :-( But this year it supposedly a very low key
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 01:23:20AM +0100, Rich Walker wrote:
As someone who reads a lot of these mailing lists, I suggest the
following perspective on this matter:
Is it possible that an in-appropriate conversational style used by
developers causes people who might be valuable
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 01:23:20AM +0100, Rich Walker wrote:
I'm not sure the issue of the accusations is the useful issue to
resolve. I'm not going to debate the particulars of whether or not
accusations have been made or might or might not be valid, because I
*really* don't think that's the
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 07:24:23PM -0400, Michael Poole wrote:
Descending to your flawed level of rhetoric,
What are the flaws?
The flaw is that of projection: assuming that silence means everyone
agrees with you.
That is what 'innocent until proven guilty' means, here. Are you
saying
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 05:25:52PM -0600, Eldon Koyle wrote:
On Aug 13 0:02+0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 12:10:07AM +0200, Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
For how long do we have to continue to wade through this flood of
emails regarding the terrible state of heart of
Andrew Suffield writes:
It seems to be working.
No it isn't. It's making things worse.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050813 12:30]:
That is what 'innocent until proven guilty' means, here. Are you
saying that this principle does not hold?
No, it does not hold. This principle does not even hold in court,
but only for criminal offences.
So until we are discussing about
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 06:46:11AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
Andrew Suffield writes:
I really *don't care* what effect it has on me. The point is to show
how very bad their actions are, so that people don't ever do something
like this again. Debian does not need a culture of witchhunts.
Steve Langasek writes:
Hmm, how do you measure that, exactly? Are you really meaning to say
that Andrew's posts are directly contributing to a culture of witch
hunts? Or are you really referring to some other standard of making
things worse here?
Andrew's posts are making it easier for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping -c3 archive.debian.org
PING archive.debian.org (208.185.25.38): 56 data bytes
--- archive.debian.org ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
--
bli
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
10 matches
Mail list logo
