I am afraid I may not be computer literate enough
to use Debian. My board is an Intel D815EEA, with
a 700mg Celeron processor, I cannot find info
that tells me I can use this OS. I want to get
away from XP as I just saw a news release that
says Microsoft is gunning for Google, and I'm
tired of
Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
Greg Pomerantz tells me that guys still haven't talked yet about the
DCC and the Debian mark.
What happened about this? I'm not involved in any way, but I'm quite
interested.
-Jonathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 09:28:26PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Fortunately nobody needs to justify their decision to killfile
you to anyone but themselves. Or even a decision for a group to
collectively killfile you.
So what you're saying is that mob rule is acceptable to you.
I think that's
[Andrew Suffield]
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 09:28:26PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Fortunately nobody needs to justify their decision to killfile
you to anyone but themselves. Or even a decision for a group to
collectively killfile you.
So what you're saying is that mob rule is acceptable to
David Moreno Garza wrote:
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 20:30 -0500, Thomas Bliesener wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping -c3 archive.debian.org
PING archive.debian.org (208.185.25.38): 56 data bytes
--- archive.debian.org ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:56:32AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Andrew Suffield]
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 09:28:26PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Fortunately nobody needs to justify their decision to killfile
you to anyone but themselves. Or even a decision for a group to
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:25:36AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
That does not extend to permit a group to go around making accusations
and advocating that other people do something based on those
accusations.
Yes Andrew, we know you think we're all idiot lemmings who believe everything
we're
quote who=Jonathan Carter date=Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:29:05AM +0200
Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
Greg Pomerantz tells me that guys still haven't talked yet about the
DCC and the Debian mark.
What happened about this? I'm not involved in any way, but I'm quite
interested.
AFAIK, Greg Pomerantz
As the
above subject refers, I wish to appeal for sponsorship of my degree programme in
Transport Logistics management. I hold a Diploma in the above mentioned
discipline but I strongly wish to further my studies if funds
avail.
Thank
you in advance
Liberty
194
Shortsone,
On 8/15/05, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That does not extend to permit a group to go around making accusations
and advocating that other people do something based on those
accusations. In the real world, this is a tort, specifically
defamation of character. And benefit of the
* Mako Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-15 14:20]:
trademark list this week. In terms of DCC, that will be up the DPL
and the SPI board who will, conveniently enough, be meeting tomorrow
IIRC.
David, can we get something on the agenda for this? I do not have a
proposal but I would like to
I wrote:
Z rejoices in the flames that his posts
inspire, which is more or less the factual content of Z's posts are
trolls [1] ...
Whoops, left out Footnote 1, which is my own take on the same topic as
http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/troll.html :
FWIW, the origin of this usage of
Benj. Mako Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exclusivity? As in, the idea of making a trademark license an
exclusive one in a given area or field? I think that would be a very
bad idea with Debian.
Think of it in terms of namespace pollution. We complain about packages
called Terminal, because it
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:17:06PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
Adam Lackorzynski wrote:
On Mon Aug 15, 2005 at 10:14:09 +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
I've pointed archive at saens -- it will take a little while to propogate.
Of course, if there were reasons for not doing that, please tell me.
14 matches
Mail list logo
