It's due to some recent and inconveniently timed personal events
rather than *anything* within Debian, but I'm going to be reducing my
involvement considerably. I'm sure people who have no insight into my
life will claim otherwise; they're full of shit, if you care. If you
don't already know my
On Jan 16, 2006 at 08:50, Andrew Suffield praised the llamas by saying:
I'm ditching the packages I don't personally use. My handful of
unfinished projects will probably remain that way. Most of the stuff
I've been hosting in ~/public_html/ directories is gone, and the rest
will probably go
(M-F-T set.)
[Frans Jessop]
When somebody wants to become a DD he is told ?Go find a package to
maintain, one that you can be the maintainer for.? I see serious
problems with this approach as Debian increases in DD's. I will how
this is in a second. What I think should be emphasized is
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[0] Including assuming dictatorial power:
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/12/the_security_th_1.html
The definition of 'dictatorial' given here is worth noting, even
if you don't read the rest of it. quis custodiet ipsos
* Matthew Garrett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060116 12:38]:
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[0] Including assuming dictatorial power:
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/12/the_security_th_1.html
The definition of 'dictatorial' given here is worth noting, even
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 04:55:57 -0600
Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Frans Jessop]
When somebody wants to become a DD he is told ?Go find a package to
maintain, one that you can be the maintainer for.? I see serious
problems with this
Benvolguts senyors,
Magradaria oferir-los els nostres serveis com a agència de
comunicació: estratègies de marketing i publicitat (campanyes de mitjans,
suports creatius, below the line), disseny gràfic (imatge corporativa,
anuncis, catàlegs, folletons, flyers, pàgines web),
[Jonas Smedegaard]
It is too hard to read the changelogs where it is (or at least should
be) clearly documented who from a team did what parts of the
packaging.
I agree that it's too hard, but I don't agree with the rest of that.
The debian changelog doesn't typically say much about who's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 07:46:50 -0600
Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Jonas Smedegaard]
It is too hard to read the changelogs where it is (or at least
should be) clearly documented who from a team did what parts of the
packaging.
I
Peter Samuelson wrote:
The point of maintaining a package is to prove that you *can* maintain
a package. Being on a team proves nothing. Being on a team and doing
most of the work proves something, if this can be measured, but that's
difficult. As it happens, I'm on at least one team where
10 matches
Mail list logo
