Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:57:51PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't agree. This isn't even the case within Debian. Binary-only NMUs
don't modify the source package, even though the binaries are
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:03:05 -0800, Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Do you realize that Xandros, who maintains a Debian derivative which they
box and sell for US$50-$129 per copy, leaves the Maintainer field
unmodified, and as far as I'm aware, was doing so for a period of *years*
before
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/18/2006 06:41 PM, Pesquisa Digital wrote:
Deu em O Debate. Janeiro de 2003.
www.pesquisadigital.com http://www.pesquisadigital.com
Óleo de fritura do McDonald's vira combustível
O combustível está sendo obtido a partir do óleo usado nas
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 02:15:15PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:03:05 -0800, Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Do you realize that Xandros, who maintains a Debian derivative which they
box and sell for US$50-$129 per copy, leaves the Maintainer field
unmodified, and
(dropping debian-devel, this is really not a technical issue)
Matt Zimmerman wrote on 17/01/2006 20:44:
I would very much appreciate if folks would review
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/05/msg00260.html and consider the
points that I raise there. I put some effort into collating
On 1/17/06, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about renaming Maintainer to Debian-Maintainer in Ubuntu's binary
packages, and having a specific Ubuntu-Maintainer?
This should probably happen in a way that all (or most) Debian-derived
distro's agree on then.
And one more problem:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 12:36:18AM +0100, Sven Mueller wrote:
(dropping debian-devel, this is really not a technical issue)
Matt Zimmerman wrote on 17/01/2006 20:44:
1. Most of the source packages in Ubuntu are inherited from Debian
unchanged (example: tetex-base).
False. They are
7 matches
Mail list logo
