Re: Call for a new DPL mediation ... This will be the only thread i will reply to in the next time about this issue.

2006-06-22 Thread MJ Ray
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 20 Jun 2006, Adam McKenna spake thusly: > > If anyone can do d-i work, and everyone who does d-i work can have > > commit access, then Sven should have commit access. > > > But if not everyone who does d-i work has commit access (but > just

Re: Call for a new DPL mediation ... This will be the only thread i will reply to in the next time about this issue.

2006-06-22 Thread Chris Waters
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:36:31AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > A small clarification that doesn't really have much bearing on what's > going on: in so far as the d-i team is the *Debian* installer team, the > project as a whole (via GR, or representatives like the DPL, tech ctte, > or delegates)

Re: Call for a new DPL mediation ... This will be the only thread i will reply to in the next time about this issue.

2006-06-22 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Clint Adams dijo [Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 02:06:09PM -0400]: > > I beg to differ in a small detail. The project gets to decide > > which _team_ is the official team, but now who all constitute the > > team, or how the team is run internally. > > Why not? Try to force Frans and Sven to wor

Re: Call for a new DPL mediation ... This will be the only thread i will reply to in the next time about this issue.

2006-06-22 Thread Matthew Garrett
Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I beg to differ in a small detail. The project gets to decide >> which _team_ is the official team, but now who all constitute the >> team, or how the team is run internally. > > Why not? Because the consitution doesn't appear to allow it? --

Re: Call for a new DPL mediation ... This will be the only thread i will reply to in the next time about this issue.

2006-06-22 Thread Clint Adams
> I beg to differ in a small detail. The project gets to decide > which _team_ is the official team, but now who all constitute the > team, or how the team is run internally. Why not? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA

Re: Call for a new DPL mediation ... This will be the only thread i will reply to in the next time about this issue.

2006-06-22 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On 22 Jun 2006, MJ Ray spake thusly: > Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> [...] You (as in GR, DPL or proper delegate) can always force >>> them out, replace them with someone else or disband the team >>> completly. >> Under which sect

Re: Call for a new DPL mediation ... This will be the only thread i will reply to in the next time about this issue.

2006-06-22 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On 22 Jun 2006, Anthony Towns said: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 11:31:56PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote: >> Neither AJ, nor the Tech Ctte., nor even the whole project through >> a GR has the power to make Sven a member of the d-i team unless the >> d-i team is willing to have Sven as a member. > > A sm

Re: Call for a new DPL mediation ... This will be the only thread i will reply to in the next time about this issue.

2006-06-22 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 11:31:56PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote: > Neither AJ, nor the Tech Ctte., nor even the whole project through a > GR has the power to make Sven a member of the d-i team unless the d-i > team is willing to have Sven as a member. A small clarification that doesn't really have mu

DebConf 7 Venue Decision Delegation

2006-06-22 Thread Anthony Towns
Hi all, In the next couple of weeks the decision on where to hold next year's DebConf will be made. The candidates at present are Sarajevo (Bosnia, SJJ) and Edinburgh (Scotland, EDI), with Safir Secerovic and Moray Allan being the chief contacts for the respective bids. In light of the discussion

Re: Call for a new DPL mediation ... This will be the only thread i will reply to in the next time about this issue.

2006-06-22 Thread MJ Ray
Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] You (as in GR, DPL or proper delegate) can always force > > them out, replace them with someone else or disband the team > > completly. > Under which section of the constitution? The d-i team isn'