Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organisations holding assets in trust for Debian should
> undertake reasonable obligations for the handling of such
> assets.
>
> As an example of best practice at the time of writing,
> SPI have made the following undertakings:
>
>
> At last count, the following had sconded the previous draft, I hope
> there is no problem with the changes made with this version.
I have no problem with these changes.
Regards,
Mako
--
Benjamin Mako Hill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mako.cc/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Saturday 22 July 2006 01:05, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Here is the latest draft of the proposal. [...]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Seconded.
Nitpicking:
move this space character
> +6. Together with the Project Leader make decisions about
On Friday 21 July 2006 17:54, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:18:44 +0200, Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > I don't think it makes sense that the Debian constitution determines
> > who can become a member of SPI. That is something that should be
> > (and probably is) d
* Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060722 01:20]:
> While I have no interest in rushing this proposal to a vote,
> and would like for us to have ample time to consider all angles and
> options, I should also note that the SPI board has no say in
> Debian's technical or nontechnical
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 06:16:43PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > I'd like to ask that we keep the discussion period for this open
> > until the SPI elections are completed and the new board has an
> > opportunity to comment.
> While I have no interest in rushing this proposal to a vot
6 matches
Mail list logo
