On 8/7/06, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Jeff Licquia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060807 15:12]:
> On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 22:07 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > How about the init-scripts? Does LSB say anything about them, or is that
> > a rather optional component?
>
> Yes, I had forgotten t
* Jeff Licquia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060807 15:12]:
> On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 22:07 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > How about the init-scripts? Does LSB say anything about them, or is that
> > a rather optional component?
>
> Yes, I had forgotten those; there were conventions in 1.3, but they have
>
On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 22:07 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> How about the init-scripts? Does LSB say anything about them, or is that
> a rather optional component?
Yes, I had forgotten those; there were conventions in 1.3, but they have
changed slightly since then.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 01:28:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> What does the LSB 3.1 say about amd64 and libdirs? Does it require lib
>> to contain 32bit libs?
>
> Does this same question apply to other 64bit arches, like sparc64 or powerpc64
> f
Joseph Neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi.
>
> User Here.
>
> RSS would be great, actually. It may not be the flashing red light you're
> looking for, but a feed or two for each suite announcing critical updates
> would be very much appreciated. Maybe you could ship Firefox (or all the
5 matches
Mail list logo