Re: Re: LSB 3.1 status for etch

2006-08-07 Thread Chris Lawrence
On 8/7/06, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * Jeff Licquia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060807 15:12]: > On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 22:07 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > How about the init-scripts? Does LSB say anything about them, or is that > > a rather optional component? > > Yes, I had forgotten t

Re: LSB 3.1 status for etch

2006-08-07 Thread Andreas Barth
* Jeff Licquia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060807 15:12]: > On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 22:07 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > How about the init-scripts? Does LSB say anything about them, or is that > > a rather optional component? > > Yes, I had forgotten those; there were conventions in 1.3, but they have >

Re: LSB 3.1 status for etch

2006-08-07 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 22:07 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > How about the init-scripts? Does LSB say anything about them, or is that > a rather optional component? Yes, I had forgotten those; there were conventions in 1.3, but they have changed slightly since then. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM

Re: LSB 3.1 status for etch

2006-08-07 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 01:28:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> What does the LSB 3.1 say about amd64 and libdirs? Does it require lib >> to contain 32bit libs? > > Does this same question apply to other 64bit arches, like sparc64 or powerpc64 > f

Re: How to best reach the users of a package?

2006-08-07 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Joseph Neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi. > > User Here. > > RSS would be great, actually. It may not be the flashing red light you're > looking for, but a feed or two for each suite announcing critical updates > would be very much appreciated. Maybe you could ship Firefox (or all the