Re: LSB 3.1 status for etch

2006-10-06 Thread Andreas Barth
* Jeff Licquia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061006 22:57]: > On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 11:00 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > Is etch now LSB compliant? Is it time to update policy to specify LSB > > 3.1 instead of 1.3? > > I won't comment on the policy decision except to say that I'd love to > see that

Re: LSB 3.1 status for etch

2006-10-06 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 11:00 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Is etch now LSB compliant? Is it time to update policy to specify LSB > 3.1 instead of 1.3? I won't comment on the policy decision except to say that I'd love to see that happen. As for LSB compliance, etch i386 and amd64, at least,