* Jeff Licquia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061006 22:57]:
> On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 11:00 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > Is etch now LSB compliant? Is it time to update policy to specify LSB
> > 3.1 instead of 1.3?
>
> I won't comment on the policy decision except to say that I'd love to
> see that
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 11:00 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Is etch now LSB compliant? Is it time to update policy to specify LSB
> 3.1 instead of 1.3?
I won't comment on the policy decision except to say that I'd love to
see that happen.
As for LSB compliance, etch i386 and amd64, at least,
2 matches
Mail list logo
