Il giorno Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:36:14 +0100
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> Where does the "Did you already MOO today..." come from? I can't find
> anything related to it.
>
> Something that seem to be related to it in Debian is:
> $ apt-get moo
> (__)
> (oo)
>/
Dear Manoj Srivastava,
thank you for your answer.
See annotations in the original message.
Yours sincerely
Jakob Johannes Blaette
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:Manoj Srivastava [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet am:Freitag, 10. November 2006 15:55
An: Jakob Johannes Blaette
Cc
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 10:35:11AM +0100, Luca Brivio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ([3] is noteworthy too...)
Don't forget the classic
http://www.clasohm.com/cows/guide1.html
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le 11.11.2006, à 15:54:53, Andrew Pollock a écrit:
> Hi,
Hello,
> I'm inclined to agree with Russell Coker[1], in that Debian should use
> something like RSA tokens to control access to Debian resources.
I already suggested [1, 2] using smart cards after the 2003 intrusion.
But no one commented
Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm inclined to agree with Russell Coker[1], in that Debian should use
> something like RSA tokens to control access to Debian resources.
>
> Given that use of project funds for something like Dunc-Tank was already
> demed inappropriate, maybe the proje
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 03:05:33PM +0100, Mario Lang wrote:
> Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm inclined to agree with Russell Coker[1], in that Debian should use
> > something like RSA tokens to control access to Debian resources.
> >
> > Given that use of project funds for som
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 11:43:57 +0100, Jakob Johannes Blatte
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> To my opinion it can be bad for our world if joke religion gets lot
>> of influence in our world with the distribution of well known
>> software.
> Well, that depends. One person's joke is another pers
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 03:05:33PM +0100, Mario Lang wrote:
> In my opinion, RSA tokens are very evil, from an accessibility point of view.
> Since you effectively state that only people with working eye-sight
> are competent enough to use your system.
There are also smartcard based tokens (like
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 03:05:33PM +0100, Mario Lang wrote:
>> In my opinion, RSA tokens are very evil, from an accessibility point of
>> view. Since you effectively state that only people with working
>> eye-sight are competent enough to use your system.
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 06:37:37PM +, Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 03:05:33PM +0100, Mario Lang wrote:
>
> > In my opinion, RSA tokens are very evil, from an accessibility point of
> > view.
> > Since you effectively state that only people with working eye-s
Il giorno Sat, 11 Nov 2006 13:22:53 +0100
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 10:35:11AM +0100, Luca Brivio
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ([3] is noteworthy too...)
>
> Don't forget the classic
> http://www.clasohm.com/cows/guide1.html
Which in fact features
11 matches
Mail list logo